Timeline for In Prometheus, is it not implied that they did not just create human life but literally all life on Earth?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 10, 2023 at 7:31 | comment | added | Valorum | @JoshuaZ - Not just 'nearly modern' but completely modern. Someone from 12000 BC would be indistinguishable from someone from 2000 AD. | |
Mar 10, 2023 at 7:11 | vote | accept | releseabe | ||
Sep 23, 2019 at 3:21 | comment | added | releseabe | @RBarryYoung: I suspect that it is often producers/directors of films who don't know their science (or perhaps care about it) -- I would guess writers often research their subject. I recall someone telling Spielberg during Jaws that shooting an oxygen tank won't cause an explosion but he insisted (and I think rightly in that case) that explosion would be more cinematic (and Simpsons really took this to heart). | |
Sep 22, 2019 at 16:12 | comment | added | RBarryYoung | The problem with many Science-Fiction movies is that the story tellers often don't understand science very well. | |
Sep 22, 2019 at 14:40 | comment | added | JoshuaZ | Since nearly modern human life existed at that point, that would indicate that Shaw and Weyland are actually wrong about what the Engineers did. There is of course the more Doylist expanation that the writers didn't think about the timeline that carefully. | |
Sep 22, 2019 at 7:30 | history | answered | Valorum | CC BY-SA 4.0 |