Timeline for Why was the first Terminator rotting?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2013 at 17:59 | history | edited | GetSet | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 29 characters in body
|
| Sep 13, 2012 at 22:04 | review | First posts | |||
| Sep 20, 2012 at 13:13 | |||||
| Aug 21, 2012 at 17:20 | comment | added | GetSet | @Jeff, that's a great point, although I'd still argue that a Terminator is not as capable as a human at healing its skin. After all, the skin is just an organic wrapping around a metal skeleton, which severely limits what biological sources the skin can draw from to regrow. Also consider that scabbing over 9mm holes is a lot simpler than restoring crushed, bruised, and torn skin. | |
| Aug 21, 2012 at 14:44 | comment | added | Jeff | @Xantec - That's exactly my point, though. But GetSet is saying the "blood vesselds don't clot, the wounds don't close" which is completely inaccurate. The blood vessels WILL clot, and the wounds WILL close, if they're properly treated. This is the opposite of "there is no process for healing/regrowth". | |
| Aug 21, 2012 at 14:36 | comment | added | Xantec | @Jeff The terminator in T2 was on a mission to protect John, which would be very hard to do if it could not pass as human. It was likely taking better care of itself, with help from John and Sarah, than the one in The Terminator was doing. | |
| Aug 21, 2012 at 14:06 | comment | added | Jeff | That's not entirely true. The Terminator in the 2nd movie is the same model, and he explicitly says (when John Conner asks) that his wounds will heal, given time and medical attention. | |
| Aug 21, 2012 at 13:11 | history | answered | GetSet | CC BY-SA 3.0 |