Timeline for Were Anakin and “The Asset” in the Mandalorian born in the same year?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
28 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2020 at 1:50 | comment | added | Marakai | @BabyYoda Isn't time travel more Star Trek than Star Wars? :P | |
| Jan 8, 2020 at 22:39 | comment | added | Doctor Doom |
@Marakai Baby Yoda is indeed baby Yoda Reborn ~> Actually, Baby Yoda is original Yoda (not reborn or anything). Season 2 will show time travel. Officially confirmed!
|
|
| Jan 6, 2020 at 15:37 | comment | added | Skooba - Stands Against AI | @Marakai Yaddle in the prequel series also messed up that theory. | |
| Jan 5, 2020 at 5:29 | comment | added | Marakai | The dang 50 years messes up my entire pet theory which is that Yoda's species procreates by reincarnation when one dies via ghost midi-chlorians. Maybe there may even only be one at a time, So Baby Yoda is indeed baby Yoda Reborn. Oh well, back to the drawing board.... | |
| Jan 4, 2020 at 21:05 | history | edited | Skooba - Stands Against AI | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 148 characters in body
|
| Jan 4, 2020 at 19:51 | comment | added | Elizabeth Moore | "Well, guess who was also born in 41 BBY, none other than Anakin Skywalker! It has also been confirmed that Darth Sidious used the force to manipulate the midi-chlorians to create Anakin." Actually, Lucasfilm has denied that Palpatine had used the Force to create Anakin. | |
| Jan 3, 2020 at 4:10 | comment | added | Doctor Doom |
In S01E02 we find out “The Asset” is actually a child of the same species as Yoda. ~> What special details did you get in the second episode about his species? The visual cue was already there in the first episode.
|
|
| Dec 13, 2019 at 22:56 | answer | added | Donatello Swansino | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 3, 2019 at 12:48 | comment | added | user28434 | @Edlothiad, yep, it would be easier to store birth year(which won't ever change) than the age(that naturally changes all the time) in the id | |
| Nov 30, 2019 at 19:46 | history | reopened |
Skooba - Stands Against AI Valorum Edlothiad Rand al'Thor♦ |
||
| Nov 30, 2019 at 18:18 | comment | added | NKCampbell | In fact we do know that they wanted to child to extract something from it - car of Episode 3. We do not yet know the origin of the child one way or the other, nor their further intentions with it. | |
| Nov 30, 2019 at 14:29 | history | edited | Giacomo1968 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
| Nov 30, 2019 at 14:28 | comment | added | Edlothiad | @Skooba I believe it was birth year | |
| Nov 30, 2019 at 14:25 | history | edited | Giacomo1968 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 12 characters in body; edited title
|
| Nov 30, 2019 at 13:35 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Nov 30, 2019 at 15:16 | |||||
| Nov 30, 2019 at 13:17 | history | edited | Skooba - Stands Against AI | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
changed the direction to match the title and maybe not future works
|
| Nov 30, 2019 at 13:14 | history | rollback | Skooba - Stands Against AI |
Rollback to Revision 1
|
|
| Nov 30, 2019 at 13:14 | comment | added | Skooba - Stands Against AI | @iammg I didn't get the impression the beacon worked that way. Apparently they have a number/code that relates to attributes, but they only had the last four(?) of the asset's which was age. | |
| Nov 30, 2019 at 13:12 | comment | added | Skooba - Stands Against AI | @NKCampbell Pershing is trying to create a clone of the asset. | |
| Nov 29, 2019 at 20:48 | comment | added | NKCampbell | ignores all the clues related to cloning | |
| Nov 29, 2019 at 20:47 | history | closed |
Valorum QuestionAuthority TheLethalCarrot♦ DavidW NKCampbell |
Opinion-based | |
| Nov 29, 2019 at 18:45 | review | Close votes | |||
| Nov 29, 2019 at 20:50 | |||||
| Nov 29, 2019 at 18:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackSciFi/status/1200474617221177344 | ||
| Nov 29, 2019 at 17:36 | history | edited | Remy Lebeau | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
changing title to match the body
|
| Nov 29, 2019 at 17:07 | history | edited | Robert Columbia |
edited tags
|
|
| Nov 29, 2019 at 16:34 | comment | added | iammg | "50 years old" can be an approximation (like "it's on a his fifties"), to indicate the age of the creature. It doesn't implies that the creature is effectively and actually "50 years old" | |
| Nov 29, 2019 at 15:04 | comment | added | OrangeDog | I'm guessing you're going to need to wait for at least the end of the first season to find out. | |
| Nov 29, 2019 at 14:48 | history | asked | Skooba - Stands Against AI | CC BY-SA 4.0 |