Timeline for Why is Stephen Fry's narration of Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone an hour longer than Jim Dale's on Audible?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2020 at 7:37 | comment | added | Jasen | 1.6% probably imperceptable, cinema files were sped up by 4% for broadcast on PAL TV networks 25FPS vs 24 and no one complained. | |
| Sep 6, 2020 at 2:18 | comment | added | David Roberts | *in one region in the USA (mea culpa). | |
| Sep 4, 2020 at 22:39 | vote | accept | RexxiA | ||
| Sep 4, 2020 at 6:27 | comment | added | David Roberts | Fry would only need to talk about 1.5% slower than Dale to rack up a 7 minute time difference over that >8hr period. This would presumably be barely perceptible, if at all, if one listened to the two books separately. If Fry spoke at 50% the speed of Dale, though, one would notice it being quite a lot slower. The normal variation in speaking speed, difficult to measure, seems more than 1.5% (even if we restrict to English-speakers in region the USA, say). | |
| Sep 3, 2020 at 13:27 | history | edited | TGnat | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
sp
|
| Sep 3, 2020 at 1:36 | history | answered | RexxiA | CC BY-SA 4.0 |