Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 2, 2021 at 5:42 comment added David Roberts Not least that the movie shows everyone running out the front gate together, including Thror.
Feb 28, 2021 at 20:20 comment added Allerleirauh @AustinHemmelgarn As I wrote: I assumed, that there where other sources out of the Tolkien-Universe, which gave the additional content to the story. Like the Simarillon (sorry for the guess of writing) and others.
Feb 28, 2021 at 18:27 comment added Austin Hemmelgarn @Allerleirauh adding to what Valorum said, the 2012-2014 Hobbit movies are an exceedingly good example of changing or adding things to create drama. The book itself is nowhere near long enough to warrant a trilogy, and they actually had to add large amounts of content to the movies that was not in the book to stretch them out so they could actually fill out a full trilogy
Feb 28, 2021 at 18:16 comment added jamesqf @Allerleirauh: "Then the movie is missleading..." You mean you've only just figured this out?
Feb 28, 2021 at 15:58 comment added Allerleirauh I read the book too, but some time ago. As I understand, they added some information from other books into the movies. So it was not absolute clear, if the changes come from "need drama" only, or were from other sources.
Feb 28, 2021 at 13:18 comment added Valorum @Allerleirauh - Movies need to change things in the original book to allow audiences to understand motivation and to create drama.
Feb 28, 2021 at 8:58 comment added Allerleirauh Then the movie is missleading, because there the stone is multiple times spoken about as the sign of the official king. Gandalf even explain the plan (in beginning of the second part) in this order: get the stone and then "apply to be king"
Feb 27, 2021 at 22:25 history answered Buzz CC BY-SA 4.0