Timeline for Who're the 5 beings Samuel Colt's gun couldn't kill?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
28 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aug 7, 2020 at 2:46 | comment | added | Davy M | The answers to this question have aged surprisingly well. Even with the introduction of alternate-universe archangels, Amara, The Empty, and other beings that we would expect to not be vulnerable to the colt, the same reasoning in the answers still mostly applies. | |
Jun 16, 2017 at 4:58 | review | Suggested edits | |||
Jun 16, 2017 at 6:18 | |||||
S Feb 18, 2017 at 10:46 | history | edited | Gallifreyan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
Feb 18, 2017 at 10:24 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Feb 18, 2017 at 10:46 | |||||
Jun 15, 2016 at 11:51 | review | Suggested edits | |||
Jun 15, 2016 at 12:21 | |||||
Dec 8, 2015 at 19:07 | comment | added | kaine | I know this question is old but would Lucifer have known about all of the beings (such as Darkness) that have been introduced in later seasons. Is there some magic reason (like a tablet) he could specifically know how that gun effects all beings (like Cain)? At the time of watching I'd thought it would be revealed to be a melted angel blade which would explain his knowledge. | |
Jul 20, 2015 at 20:17 | answer | added | 83457 | timeline score: 3 | |
Jan 9, 2015 at 3:03 | answer | added | Lakey | timeline score: 10 | |
Oct 1, 2014 at 16:41 | review | Suggested edits | |||
Oct 1, 2014 at 17:12 | |||||
Jun 1, 2013 at 16:45 | history | protected | user1027 | ||
Jun 1, 2013 at 5:33 | comment | added | Kevin | @Beofett at least it wasn't post 666 | |
Jun 1, 2013 at 1:54 | answer | added | Iealch | timeline score: -3 | |
May 30, 2013 at 18:01 | comment | added | Beofett | The URL for this question is... unfortunate. | |
May 30, 2013 at 16:33 | answer | added | user14926 | timeline score: -3 | |
May 27, 2013 at 11:12 | answer | added | charles | timeline score: -2 | |
May 23, 2013 at 20:15 | answer | added | NatsuDragneel | timeline score: -3 | |
Feb 26, 2013 at 13:47 | comment | added | Kevin Howell | @JBKing Lucifer doesn't lie. He said so. He's like the internet. | |
Feb 26, 2013 at 13:37 | answer | added | Marcusangel | timeline score: 3 | |
Feb 5, 2013 at 23:36 | comment | added | JB King | Is there a reason to believe Lucifer wouldn't lie here? | |
Feb 5, 2013 at 10:18 | comment | added | user8252 | @Rich not in the catholic dogma, as Uriel is not mentioned in the Bible. | |
Feb 5, 2013 at 1:08 | answer | added | Nyarlathotep | timeline score: 0 | |
Oct 24, 2012 at 19:31 | vote | accept | AncientSwordRage♦ | ||
Oct 22, 2012 at 21:30 | comment | added | Rich | If you start with the assumption that Lucifer is an arch-angel, then there are at least 5 of them. The 4 traditional "good-guy" archangels are Michael, Gabriel, Uriel, and Rafael. | |
Oct 22, 2012 at 15:20 | answer | added | KutuluMike | timeline score: 34 | |
Oct 22, 2012 at 15:19 | answer | added | John O | timeline score: 4 | |
Oct 22, 2012 at 15:06 | comment | added | Iszi | Given that Lucifer cannot be killed by the Colt, and that he is one among five, I would gather that the simplest explanation is: All Archangels (4), plus God. However, I'm not aware of this ever being specified in canon. What the angel blades can/cannot do should probably be a separate question. It's likely that angel blades are much more specifically attuned to angels/demons than they are other creatures, similar to how holy water would work on a demon but not on a werewolf or shapeshifter. The Colt is one of few weapons which are so generally effective. | |
Oct 22, 2012 at 15:01 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackSciFi/status/260395567174283264 | ||
Oct 22, 2012 at 14:19 | history | asked | AncientSwordRage♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |