Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 13, 2021 at 12:58 vote accept Ginasius
Aug 11, 2021 at 12:35 answer added Ginasius timeline score: 12
Aug 9, 2021 at 13:52 comment added user2490 My recollection is that the books consist mostly of dialog. In conversation, it's not really natural for someone to say, "Here we are aboard this 12.7 km starship."
Aug 9, 2021 at 3:01 history tweeted twitter.com/StackSciFi/status/1424566387905896452
Aug 8, 2021 at 23:47 comment added Invisible Trihedron It's an interesting question. But I think Asimov deliberately kept some aspects of technology vague in his stories in order to make them more timeless. It's easy to make a story sound anachronistic if you get too specific, e.g., by having characters rely on paper calculations instead of computers (Heinlein), smoke cigarettes on spaceships (Asimov), or feel utterly helpless in the absence of a male protector (Levin). Arthur Clarke and Cordwainer Smith managed to avoid most anachronisms in their work by never explaining how their technology worked.
Aug 8, 2021 at 23:39 history edited Invisible Trihedron CC BY-SA 4.0
Corrected spelling and grammar
Aug 8, 2021 at 17:42 history asked Ginasius CC BY-SA 4.0