Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 10 at 14:51 comment added Lexible –1 "downright misleading" is a falsehood. Not just in the case of Tolkien, but in the case of any author. It is not the case that a published work of fiction is more or less real than unpublished work. As long as authorship and posthumous contribution is made clear, such works may range from "this how the story developed" (e.g., Unfinished Tales), to "here are the contours of the story (The Silmarillion)", to "here's an alternative take" to "here's a novel story" (with your without fleshing out). "Misleading" implies that there's a real fictional story, as opposed to a preferred one.
Jul 2 at 11:03 comment added PLL @JohnBollinger: I don’t read the question as primarily about legal rights or permissions — much more about personal and moral permission, J.R.R. Tolkien’s intentions and preferences.
Jul 2 at 4:43 comment added RC_23 I doubt JRRT had much concern, or any, for what happened with his papers after his death. He was a devout Catholic Christian, and as he expected to either be in Heaven or Hell, in neither case would anything left on Earth have any significance whatsoever (other than the welfare of his family).
Jul 2 at 2:50 comment added galacticninja Welcome to Science Fiction & Fantasy SE! Please consider registering your account, which gives you access to more site features. As a registered user, you will be able to vote, and you won’t lose access to your post if you switch devices or browsers, or when your browser cookies are cleared. Registering is easy and allows you to participate fully in our community. For more info, see Why should I register my account?
Jul 1 at 14:15 comment added John Bollinger The answers address the question posed well, but as a side note, as long as the elder Tolkein still owned the rights in question at the time of his death, someone was going to inherit them. The dead do not own anything. It didn't have to be Christopher who received them, but the question seems to suppose that there might be a scenario in which no one could lawfully have done what Christopher did, and that's not the case.
Jul 1 at 6:05 history became hot network question
Jun 30 at 23:53 answer added ibid timeline score: 32
Jun 30 at 22:04 answer added Valorum timeline score: 72
S Jun 30 at 21:57 review First questions
Jun 30 at 21:59
S Jun 30 at 21:57 history asked Iyan CC BY-SA 4.0