Timeline for Is the species name "Ewoks" simply "Wookiees" with the syllables reversed?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Nov 12, 2016 at 18:04 | history | suggested | Ginasius |
add tag Ewoks
|
|
| Nov 12, 2016 at 17:54 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Nov 12, 2016 at 18:04 | |||||
| Jun 12, 2013 at 0:33 | vote | accept | Major Stackings | ||
| Jun 3, 2013 at 10:21 | comment | added | user11683 | @ShreevatsaR Oops! I think you are right. The k-sound probably does belong to the second syllable in "Wookiee". Aargh! Unfortunately, (approximate) phonetic anagram does not communicate how similar the two words are. | |
| Jun 3, 2013 at 5:24 | comment | added | ShreevatsaR | @MajorStackings: "Wookie" with the syllables reversed would be "kiewoo", I think? | |
| Jun 3, 2013 at 4:39 | history | edited | Major Stackings | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 5 characters in body
|
| Jun 3, 2013 at 2:33 | history | edited | Major Stackings | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Edited as suggested
|
| Jun 3, 2013 at 1:01 | comment | added | Major Stackings | @Izkata Backwards sounded better than sideways... ;P | |
| Jun 3, 2013 at 0:39 | comment | added | Izkata | But Wookie backwards would be Eikoow - even dropping letters to get Ekow, they're in the wrong order... | |
| S Jun 3, 2013 at 0:31 | history | suggested | Niall C. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Typo in title
|
| Jun 3, 2013 at 0:10 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackSciFi/status/341346195060441088 | ||
| Jun 3, 2013 at 0:05 | answer | added | user8719 | timeline score: 12 | |
| Jun 3, 2013 at 0:05 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jun 3, 2013 at 0:31 | |||||
| Jun 2, 2013 at 23:21 | history | asked | Major Stackings | CC BY-SA 3.0 |