Skip to main content
21 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 1, 2018 at 3:15 comment added Misha R The laws of robotics say nothing about protecting the essence of humanity.
Jan 31, 2018 at 19:58 history edited SQB
Properly tagged
S Dec 12, 2016 at 12:35 history suggested Bebs V CC BY-SA 3.0
Correct tag.
Dec 12, 2016 at 11:47 review Suggested edits
S Dec 12, 2016 at 12:35
Dec 29, 2015 at 8:24 answer added Broklynite timeline score: 0
Jul 25, 2013 at 0:18 comment added OghmaOsiris @PaulD.Waite She could have slowly coerced the political structure to go towards peace. She could have falsified documents causing decisions to be more peaceful, etc.
Jul 23, 2013 at 9:53 comment added Paul D. Waite "there are a lot more efficient and less drastic means that still followed the fundamental Laws of Robotics?" - Like?
Jul 23, 2013 at 8:01 answer added Letemilydothat timeline score: -4
Nov 6, 2012 at 5:04 answer added Keegan timeline score: -1
Aug 6, 2012 at 9:41 comment added Nick Its lucky the robots didn't take the train of thought that the best way to minimise human suffering is to KILL ALL HUMANS. After all, no humans means no human suffering. If you integrate over time the 6billion deaths now are a lot less than the future years of human suffering...
May 7, 2012 at 14:28 comment added Peter Cassetta My logic is undeniable.
Aug 17, 2011 at 2:02 history edited OghmaOsiris CC BY-SA 3.0
edited title
Jul 5, 2011 at 21:47 vote accept OghmaOsiris
Jul 2, 2011 at 23:32 answer added Edward Strange timeline score: 4
Jul 2, 2011 at 10:34 answer added Sydenam timeline score: 0
Jul 2, 2011 at 4:09 answer added Xantec timeline score: 4
Jul 2, 2011 at 0:11 answer added Mark Bessey timeline score: 5
Jul 1, 2011 at 20:11 answer added gnovice timeline score: 53
Jul 1, 2011 at 19:46 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackSciFi/status/86883477856862208
Jul 1, 2011 at 19:33 answer added System Down timeline score: 13
Jul 1, 2011 at 19:25 history asked OghmaOsiris CC BY-SA 3.0