Timeline for Why did Sméagol turn into a 'creature' when addicted to the ring, but not Bilbo Baggins?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2014 at 12:33 | history | edited | Meat Trademark | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Capitalization, typo and punctuation.
|
| Jan 14, 2014 at 12:31 | comment | added | Meat Trademark | Sorry, Ruben, but this is not a constructive answer. This seems to be commentary and opinion which should be a comment as opposed to an answer. Plus, you should read the comments first. Don't be too discouraged; you'll get the hang of it. | |
| Jan 14, 2014 at 10:30 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| Jan 14, 2014 at 12:33 | |||||
| Jan 13, 2014 at 19:20 | comment | added | DVK-on-Ahch-To | (1) Smeagol is a Stoor, one of the branches of hobbitkind. See tolkien.cro.net/hobbits/gollum.html (2) The other things you noted are merely duplicates of other answers. | |
| Jan 13, 2014 at 18:00 | review | First posts | |||
| Jan 13, 2014 at 18:21 | |||||
| Jan 13, 2014 at 17:41 | history | answered | Ruben Verschueren | CC BY-SA 3.0 |