Timeline for Why couldn't Odin go to wars?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2017 at 21:04 | history | edited | user31178 |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 3, 2015 at 7:02 | vote | accept | Doctor Doom | ||
| May 26, 2014 at 14:31 | history | edited | phantom42 |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 6, 2014 at 18:16 | comment | added | Gorchestopher H | Regardless of the false premise, the answer to "Why couldn't Odin go to war?" is "Odin is the king, and is old and tired. He's unfit for extensive travel, prolonged combat, and other war-related activities." | |
| Feb 6, 2014 at 0:07 | answer | added | System Down | timeline score: 4 | |
| Feb 5, 2014 at 21:19 | comment | added | Valorum | Agree with @steveha - The comment is intended as light-hearted flattery; "The battle went well but would have gone even better if you were at the vanguard". Odin knows full well that he's too old to fight any more battles (indeed, he's been actively considering retirement since we first met him in film one) but he acknowledges the flattery anyway. | |
| Feb 5, 2014 at 21:09 | comment | added | steveha | You are looking for something that isn't there. The scene is simple: Thor is reporting to Odin, Thor incidentally makes a flattering comment, Odin comments on the flattery. There is no weird mysterious secret agenda here, and you can look up the idiom "butter up" to see for yourself what it means. I gave you a link in my answer. | |
| Feb 5, 2014 at 21:02 | history | edited | Doctor Doom | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 432 characters in body
|
| Feb 5, 2014 at 20:43 | history | edited | Doctor Doom | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 4 characters in body
|
| Feb 5, 2014 at 20:41 | answer | added | steveha | timeline score: 6 | |
| Feb 5, 2014 at 20:38 | answer | added | phantom42 | timeline score: 10 | |
| Feb 5, 2014 at 20:30 | history | asked | Doctor Doom | CC BY-SA 3.0 |