Skip to main content
Correct spelling.
Source Link
LogicDictates
  • 134.4k
  • 26
  • 484
  • 589

In fact, this is a big impossibility, not just a "litle"little thing with no importance". The argument of "controlling the dream towards a second and a third level" would be aceptableacceptable if a one person dream. We are talking about 7seven people that share these diferentdifferent levels--too much of a distortion. The natural way to go would be each one of them walk their unique way since the second dream level. I can't accept this size of divergence.

Having said that, I close my eyes to that because I loved the movie. What I loved about the movie was the exploration of the mind features which I think to be accurate.

In fact, this is a big impossibility, not just a "litle thing with no importance". The argument of "controlling the dream towards a second and a third level" would be aceptable if a one person dream. We are talking about 7 people that share these diferent levels--too much of a distortion. The natural way to go would be each one of them walk their unique way since the second dream level. I can't accept this size of divergence.

Having said that, I close my eyes to that because I loved the movie. What I loved about the movie was the exploration of the mind features which I think to be accurate.

In fact, this is a big impossibility, not just a "little thing with no importance". The argument of "controlling the dream towards a second and a third level" would be acceptable if a one person dream. We are talking about seven people that share these different levels--too much of a distortion. The natural way to go would be each one of them walk their unique way since the second dream level. I can't accept this size of divergence.

Having said that, I close my eyes to that because I loved the movie. What I loved about the movie was the exploration of the mind features which I think to be accurate.

edited body
Source Link
Judith Jones
  • 8.5k
  • 32
  • 105

In fact, this is a big impossibility, not just a "litle thing with no importance". The argument of "controlling the dream towards a second and a third level" would be aceptable if a one person dream. We are talking about 7 people that share these diferent levels--too much of a distortion. The natural way to go would be each one of them walk their unique way since the second dream level. I can't accept this size of divergence.

Having said that, I close my eyes to that because I loved the movie. What I loved about the movie was the exploration of the mind features witchwhich I think to be accurate.

In fact, this is a big impossibility, not just a "litle thing with no importance". The argument of "controlling the dream towards a second and a third level" would be aceptable if a one person dream. We are talking about 7 people that share these diferent levels--too much of a distortion. The natural way to go would be each one of them walk their unique way since the second dream level. I can't accept this size of divergence.

Having said that, I close my eyes to that because I loved the movie. What I loved about the movie was the exploration of the mind features witch I think to be accurate.

In fact, this is a big impossibility, not just a "litle thing with no importance". The argument of "controlling the dream towards a second and a third level" would be aceptable if a one person dream. We are talking about 7 people that share these diferent levels--too much of a distortion. The natural way to go would be each one of them walk their unique way since the second dream level. I can't accept this size of divergence.

Having said that, I close my eyes to that because I loved the movie. What I loved about the movie was the exploration of the mind features which I think to be accurate.

In fact, this is a big impossibility, not just a "litle thing with no importance". The argument of "controlling the dream towards a second and a third level" would be aceptable if a one person dream. We are talking about 7 personspeople that share thisthese diferent levels  - to-too much of a distortion. The natural way to go would be each one of them walk their unique way since the second dream level. I cant aceptcan't accept this size of divergence.

Having said that, I close my eyes to that because I loved the movie. What I loved about the movie was the exploration of the mind features witch I think to be accurate.

Sorry for the english, it not my natural language.

In fact, this is a big impossibility, not just a "litle thing with no importance". The argument of "controlling the dream towards a second and a third level" would be aceptable if a one person dream. We are talking about 7 persons that share this diferent levels  - to much of a distortion. The natural way to go would be each one of them walk their unique way since the second dream level. I cant acept this size of divergence.

Having said that, I close my eyes to that because I loved the movie. What I loved about the movie was the exploration of the mind features witch I think to be accurate.

Sorry for the english, it not my natural language.

In fact, this is a big impossibility, not just a "litle thing with no importance". The argument of "controlling the dream towards a second and a third level" would be aceptable if a one person dream. We are talking about 7 people that share these diferent levels--too much of a distortion. The natural way to go would be each one of them walk their unique way since the second dream level. I can't accept this size of divergence.

Having said that, I close my eyes to that because I loved the movie. What I loved about the movie was the exploration of the mind features witch I think to be accurate.

Source Link
Loading