Skip to main content
edited body
Source Link
Michael Borgwardt
  • 17.9k
  • 2
  • 72
  • 90

Let's run the numbers:

So:

  • A 100m section of wall would contain about 21350100*1000 = about 1 billion kg of ice.
  • Burning 1 kg of wood can melt (at 70% efficiency) about 3130 kg of ice.
  • Which means you'd need to burn about 2500 fully grown trees
  • In practice, efficiency would be lower, but you wouldn't need to melt the entire wall section to make it collapse. OTOH, the melting water as well as partial collapses would tend to extinguish the fire.

In practice, efficiency would be lower, but you wouldn't need to melt the entire wall section to make it collapse. OTOH, the melting water as well as partial collapses would tend to extinguish the fire.

Given a force of many thousands of wildlings, as well as giants and Mammoths, it seems doable. But it would be a massive effort requiring many days, and giving the Night's Watch ample warning (via a gigantic smoke cloud, even if there were no patrols) and time for countermeasures.

Simply digging a tunnel would seem to be an easier and quicker alternative.

Let's run the numbers:

So:

  • A 100m section of wall would contain about 21350100*1000 = about 1 billion kg of ice.
  • Burning 1 kg of wood can melt (at 70% efficiency) about 31 kg of ice.
  • Which means you'd need to burn about 2500 fully grown trees
  • In practice, efficiency would be lower, but you wouldn't need to melt the entire wall section to make it collapse. OTOH, the melting water as well as partial collapses would tend to extinguish the fire.

Given a force of many thousands of wildlings, as well as giants and Mammoths, it seems doable. But it would be a massive effort requiring many days, and giving the Night's Watch ample warning (via a gigantic smoke cloud, even if there were no patrols) and time for countermeasures.

Simply digging a tunnel would seem to be an easier and quicker alternative.

Let's run the numbers:

So:

  • A 100m section of wall would contain about 21350100*1000 = about 1 billion kg of ice.
  • Burning 1 kg of wood can melt (at 70% efficiency) about 30 kg of ice.
  • Which means you'd need to burn about 2500 fully grown trees

In practice, efficiency would be lower, but you wouldn't need to melt the entire wall section to make it collapse. OTOH, the melting water as well as partial collapses would tend to extinguish the fire.

Given a force of many thousands of wildlings, as well as giants and Mammoths, it seems doable. But it would be a massive effort requiring many days, and giving the Night's Watch ample warning (via a gigantic smoke cloud, even if there were no patrols) and time for countermeasures.

Simply digging a tunnel would seem to be an easier and quicker alternative.

added 10 characters in body
Source Link
Michael Borgwardt
  • 17.9k
  • 2
  • 72
  • 90

Let's run the numbers:

So:

  • A 100m section of wall would contain about 21350100*1000 = about 1 billion kg of ice.
  • Burning 1 kg of wood can melt (at 70% efficiency) about 31 kg of ice.
  • Which means you'd need to burn about 2500 fully grown trees
  • In practice, efficiency would be lower, but you wouldn't need to melt the entire wall section to make it collapse. OTOH, the melting water as well as partial collapses would tend to extinguish the fire.

Given a force of many thousands of wildlings, as well as giants and Mammoths, it seems doable. But it would be a massive effort requiring many days, and giving the Night's Watch ample warning (via a gigantic smoke cloud, even if there were no patrols) and time for countermeasures.

Simply digging a tunnel would seem to be an easier and quicker alternative.

Let's run the numbers:

So:

  • A 100m section of wall would contain about 21350100*1000 = about 1 billion kg of ice.
  • Burning 1 kg of wood can melt (at 70% efficiency) about 31 kg of ice.
  • Which means you'd need to burn about 2500 fully grown trees
  • In practice, efficiency would be lower, but you wouldn't need to melt the entire wall section to make it collapse. OTOH, the melting water as well as partial collapses would tend to extinguish the fire.

Given a force of many thousands of wildlings, as well as giants and Mammoths, it seems doable. But it would be a massive effort requiring many days, and giving the Night's Watch ample warning (via a gigantic smoke cloud, even if there were no patrols) and time for countermeasures.

Simply digging a tunnel would seem to be an easier and quicker alternative.

Let's run the numbers:

So:

  • A 100m section of wall would contain about 21350100*1000 = about 1 billion kg of ice.
  • Burning 1 kg of wood can melt (at 70% efficiency) about 31 kg of ice.
  • Which means you'd need to burn about 2500 fully grown trees
  • In practice, efficiency would be lower, but you wouldn't need to melt the entire wall section to make it collapse. OTOH, the melting water as well as partial collapses would tend to extinguish the fire.

Given a force of many thousands of wildlings, as well as giants and Mammoths, it seems doable. But it would be a massive effort requiring many days, and giving the Night's Watch ample warning (via a gigantic smoke cloud, even if there were no patrols) and time for countermeasures.

Simply digging a tunnel would seem to be an easier and quicker alternative.

Source Link
Michael Borgwardt
  • 17.9k
  • 2
  • 72
  • 90

Let's run the numbers:

So:

  • A 100m section of wall would contain about 21350100*1000 = about 1 billion kg of ice.
  • Burning 1 kg of wood can melt (at 70% efficiency) about 31 kg of ice.
  • Which means you'd need to burn about 2500 fully grown trees
  • In practice, efficiency would be lower, but you wouldn't need to melt the entire wall section to make it collapse. OTOH, the melting water as well as partial collapses would tend to extinguish the fire.

Given a force of many thousands of wildlings, as well as giants and Mammoths, it seems doable. But it would be a massive effort requiring many days, and giving the Night's Watch ample warning (via a gigantic smoke cloud, even if there were no patrols) and time for countermeasures.

Simply digging a tunnel would seem to be an easier and quicker alternative.