Timeline for Is Harry Potter's magic random, "mathematical" or does it have its own personality?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2014 at 7:49 | comment | added | CandiedMango | @DVK I have seen the question and answer before but i was more referring to the JKR Quote so with Aguamenti I would assume you can conjure water but it will not last. That's just what i think though obviously you are entitled to interpret anyway you wish. I'm sure how drinking Aguamenti water would work (with my assumption) you would be able to drink it but it may disappear before you body takes advantage of it. I must say though water is definitely not food hmm JKR is confusing me with this one. | |
| Jun 2, 2014 at 15:51 | comment | added | DVK-on-Ahch-To | water vs food was discussed before: scifi.stackexchange.com/a/24801/976 | |
| Jun 2, 2014 at 15:02 | comment | added | CandiedMango | @JohnP Yeah, I'm not entirely sure how it works. I mean if you conjure it and then it disappears after a while that's fine as it obeys the laws. I would also say it uses the moisture around you, but the source of water for Aguamenti is debated. | |
| Jun 2, 2014 at 14:57 | comment | added | JohnP | I don't think that "water out of thin air" is exactly correct. Water vapor is a large component of air, and you don't create it, you condense it. I would think the "thin air" comment would be more like the disappearing gold from the Quidditch World Cup. | |
| Jun 2, 2014 at 11:39 | history | answered | CandiedMango | CC BY-SA 3.0 |