Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 12, 2017 at 9:27 history edited Mithical
edited tags
Dec 26, 2016 at 10:35 comment added Spencer Taking the film on its own merits, when you paint yourself into a corner, you're likely to leave some footprints in the wet paint.
Apr 10, 2016 at 8:33 answer added Ber timeline score: 10
Jun 6, 2014 at 20:47 answer added Oldcat timeline score: -1
Jun 6, 2014 at 17:40 comment added Major Stackings +1 Continuity and story line faithfulness have prevented me from seeing part II of the Hobbit film series. As a fan of the books, IMHO, Jackson's revisioned version of Middle-Earth is a visually stimulating yet intellectually unsatisfying experience.
Jun 6, 2014 at 14:40 answer added Brian Warshaw timeline score: 3
Jun 6, 2014 at 13:59 comment added Bob Tway @DanielRoseman The third is rather better, and worth the time. The first is still the best, though.
Jun 6, 2014 at 13:51 comment added Daniel Roseman This is exactly why I gave up on the films at that point and didn't bother seeing the third. Not only are Faramir's (and Theoden's as well) actions totally out of character, they make no sense at all.
Jun 6, 2014 at 13:04 history edited user14111 CC BY-SA 3.0
fixed apostrophes
Jun 6, 2014 at 12:58 history asked Bob Tway CC BY-SA 3.0