Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 24, 2019 at 20:58 comment added Andres F. @TheMathemagician He hasn't said anything one way or the other that I know of. I think part of the fun of the story is that we as readers cannot be sure whether Dunk is telling the truth. And does it really matter? Dunk is a nice guy and he deserves his knighthood ;)
Oct 2, 2014 at 15:18 comment added TheMathemagician Has GRRM confirmed that Ser Arlan did not in fact knight Ser Duncan? - although he doubtless intended to do so.
Jul 1, 2014 at 14:32 comment added Andres F. The only way you can counter this would be by showing an example where someone is knighted by another knight, and his knighthood doesn't "stick" on grounds other than "I don't believe the knight actually knighted you". Otherwise, you have no basis to doubt on the face of pretty convincing evidence.
Jul 1, 2014 at 14:30 comment added Andres F. I'd say it's a representative example, since Dunk actually convinced royalty (Prince Baelor) and other knights of renown, not a random bunch of Sers. I understand you not trusting what the wiki says (they are pretty clear on the matter, but what are their sources?). However, this example shows the knighthood always "sticks". The only point of contention is whether you witnessed the knighting and/or believe it actually happened.
Jul 1, 2014 at 13:41 comment added einpoklum That's one fortunate example. The question is whether you can assume that's enough.
Jul 1, 2014 at 11:44 comment added Andres F. No, where did you get that idea? Being knighted by a knight always "sticks". Ser Duncan's knighthood "stuck", and all people had was his word that Ser Arlan had knighted him.
Jul 1, 2014 at 10:30 comment added einpoklum Well, apparently not. That is, you can be knighted, but it won't 'stick'.
Jun 29, 2014 at 15:29 history edited Andres F. CC BY-SA 3.0
added 191 characters in body
Jun 29, 2014 at 15:23 history answered Andres F. CC BY-SA 3.0