Timeline for Is Quidditch an inherently flawed sport?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Jul 21, 2014 at 2:42 | history | suggested | Pobrecita | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
I did minor edits. Punctuation, Word insertion, and Sentence structure edits.
|
| Jul 21, 2014 at 0:06 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jul 21, 2014 at 2:42 | |||||
| Jul 18, 2014 at 15:51 | comment | added | Mac Cooper | @MattThrower, actually yeah you got me there. I'd suggest it was perhaps a phsycological effect ("Three days in, no sleep and the players are scrabbling for the snitch. Who can know how long it will last until one seeker succumbs to the other!") but then, we know from HP4 that they bring in substitutes... so yeah, you got me :) | |
| Jul 18, 2014 at 15:46 | comment | added | Bob Tway | @MacCooper But even if bigger point differentials are the norm, there's still the issue of the losing team not wanting to catch the snitch. The focus is still entirely on the seeker. | |
| Jul 18, 2014 at 15:09 | comment | added | Mac Cooper | If I may add -- I see Hogwarts Quidditch like school football: unprofessional. I would suggest, based on the example @himarm used, that in professional Quidditch the scores have a bigger difference: racking up points quicker, and in a longer game due to professional playing, means a gap can reach hundreds of points, unlike in Hogwarts where 40 point gap is large. | |
| Jul 18, 2014 at 15:06 | history | answered | Himarm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |