Timeline for Why Dumbledore kept mum until the very end of the "Deathly Hallows"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2014 at 18:19 | comment | added | Robert | @iamserious 'mum' means silent or to keep something to yourself. | |
| Dec 29, 2014 at 14:32 | comment | added | iamserious |
I am sorry, what is "mum" in your question? I think I'm missing something
|
|
| Sep 22, 2014 at 19:47 | answer | added | DVK-on-Ahch-To | timeline score: 12 | |
| Sep 22, 2014 at 19:15 | comment | added | DVK-on-Ahch-To | Harry! You will go to the Dagobah System, and learn from Wizard Yoda! | |
| Sep 22, 2014 at 17:30 | comment | added | Himarm | telling someone that the end goal was that you had to die, in essence, because you yourself were a horrocrux(of sorts) is not a good way to spur this person on. Harry may have continued but his friends may have attempted to stop him from going on. this was "selfish" of dumbledore, but since Harry had to save the world according to prophecy dumbledore is basically just helping harry without distractions, like hey you gota die tho. | |
| Sep 22, 2014 at 16:52 | comment | added | Priyanka.Patil | Not all of the dumbledore's silences were abt harry's need to die.were they? .The trio spent a lot of time working out how to destroy horcruxes.Why withhold this information though? | |
| Sep 22, 2014 at 16:37 | comment | added | Baldrickk | 1) Pacing. 2) Dumbledore didn't have all the answers at the start (he only went hunting horcruxes in HBP) 3) Telling someone they need to die and getting them to agree/go along with it is hard. Better to let them figure it out. Not an answer as no quotes etc. Feel free to take this and run with it. | |
| Sep 22, 2014 at 16:36 | answer | added | Himarm | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 22, 2014 at 15:52 | history | edited | jwodder | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Proofreading
|
| Sep 22, 2014 at 15:45 | history | asked | Priyanka.Patil | CC BY-SA 3.0 |