Timeline for Why doesn't the Doctor duplicate himself when he has multiple medical emergencies at the same time?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
41 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 8, 2018 at 10:10 | history | edited | TheLethalCarrot♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 4 characters in body
|
Nov 7, 2018 at 11:47 | history | protected | TheLethalCarrot♦ | ||
Nov 6, 2018 at 20:36 | answer | added | RDFozz | timeline score: 0 | |
Nov 6, 2018 at 18:06 | answer | added | Cyber Trec | timeline score: 0 | |
Sep 27, 2017 at 15:00 | vote | accept | Kalamane | ||
May 27, 2017 at 6:51 | comment | added | Kevin | The writers already had an episode on the mind-body problem and did not want two. | |
May 27, 2017 at 0:10 | comment | added | DCShannon | I don't want to spend all the time to properly research this, but none of these answer seem to mention that the doctor has a "matrix", that the show presents this as something that can't be copied, and that the ship is supposed to only be able to support one. | |
May 26, 2017 at 13:33 | comment | added | komodosp | Because the doctor is represented by a reference type, not a value type. | |
May 26, 2017 at 12:53 | answer | added | Jeroen Keppens | timeline score: -1 | |
Mar 5, 2017 at 17:59 | comment | added | wizzwizz4 | @JohnSensebe It's relatively simple to write a driver to allow that, by reading the relevant data into memory then calling the relevant kernel function to page and execute it. However, the Enterprise may be slightly more complicated than Windows, so your point still stands. | |
Jan 24, 2017 at 4:57 | answer | added | Zac | timeline score: 9 | |
S May 26, 2016 at 14:28 | history | bounty ended | Kalamane | ||
S May 26, 2016 at 14:28 | history | notice removed | Kalamane | ||
May 23, 2016 at 12:16 | comment | added | Rincewind | Because the show would be less interesting if he could... | |
May 19, 2016 at 17:32 | comment | added | Ellesedil | @JeremyHeiler: You can bypass the morality by simply having all instances of the Doctor access and store their experiences in the same repository. Then, since all running instances of the Doctor will essentially have the same experiences and moralities, you can bypass the moral dilemma without concern. In fact, I'd leave it up to the Doctor's primary program to decide which copies to deactivate, so now the choice is entirely up to the Doctor. | |
S May 19, 2016 at 14:13 | history | bounty started | Kalamane | ||
S May 19, 2016 at 14:13 | history | notice added | Kalamane | Authoritative reference needed | |
May 16, 2016 at 2:44 | comment | added | 1252748 |
@JeremyHeiler git merge
|
|
S May 15, 2016 at 22:04 | history | suggested | sfhq_sf |
edited tags
|
|
May 15, 2016 at 21:36 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S May 15, 2016 at 22:04 | |||||
May 15, 2016 at 21:27 | answer | added | c1646091 | timeline score: 2 | |
May 4, 2016 at 15:02 | comment | added | John Sensebe | EXEs can't run from a ZIP file. Just because there are backups doesn't mean those backups can be executed. | |
May 4, 2016 at 13:48 | answer | added | PMar | timeline score: 1 | |
Nov 2, 2015 at 1:20 | comment | added | VapedCrusader | Interesting; that "separate power source" rule isn't true on TNG's enterprise- I remember Geordi having to justify keeping his holocrush running in 'booby-trap', when the ship is being slowly drained...maybe due to the expanded medical role of the technology on Voyager? | |
Nov 2, 2015 at 1:07 | answer | added | TrekFreakazoid | timeline score: 2 | |
Sep 5, 2014 at 14:58 | comment | added | Zibbobz | To answer your questions concerning "Concerning Flight", holographic technology has been shown on numerous occasions to require its own separate power source from the rest of the ship (Voyager specifically made reference to this), so even when the entire rest of the ship is losing power, it will still remain online. The power sources are also incompatable with each other, so they can't just plug the holodeck power generator in when they want to charge the ship. | |
Sep 5, 2014 at 3:40 | answer | added | user3559247 | timeline score: 2 | |
Apr 25, 2014 at 21:11 | answer | added | philosopher-animal | timeline score: 1 | |
Oct 13, 2012 at 20:03 | answer | added | Smerrills | timeline score: 12 | |
Apr 4, 2012 at 13:40 | answer | added | Andrew J. Brehm | timeline score: 15 | |
Jan 13, 2012 at 6:47 | answer | added | Timothy Reynolds | timeline score: 1 | |
Nov 26, 2011 at 4:05 | comment | added | Jeremy | My question would be: If you copied the Doctor, would you then have two Doctors who could potentially become two different "people"? If so, killing the copy would be immoral. | |
Nov 22, 2011 at 4:36 | vote | accept | Kalamane | ||
Nov 22, 2011 at 2:59 | history | edited | Kalamane | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 523 characters in body
|
Nov 19, 2011 at 12:53 | comment | added | Xantec | In the episode Lifesigns the Doctor created a holographic body for a dying Vidiian while also loading the memories and synaptic patterns for them into the computer. This would seem to negate any supposed technological limitations in either the computer memory or the holo-emitters in-so far as not being able to run multiple "artificial" intelligences or complex holo-matrixes (yes, in this case I am considering any biological intelligence copied into a computer to be artifical). | |
Nov 19, 2011 at 10:28 | answer | added | Schroedingers Cat | timeline score: 10 | |
Nov 19, 2011 at 8:35 | answer | added | MPelletier | timeline score: 2 | |
Nov 19, 2011 at 8:21 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackSciFi/status/137807771184795648 | ||
Nov 19, 2011 at 4:24 | comment | added | Chad Levy | Probably the same reason people can't be cloned by the transporter (except Riker and Evil Riker). There would be no peril for people and holographic doctors who could simply be replicated if lost. | |
Nov 18, 2011 at 23:44 | answer | added | Mike Scott | timeline score: 19 | |
Nov 18, 2011 at 23:12 | history | asked | Kalamane | CC BY-SA 3.0 |