Timeline for Why didn't the Empire send other forces in alongside the AT-ATs?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Jul 2, 2022 at 18:59 | history | suggested | Ethan Chan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Capitalization
|
| Jul 2, 2022 at 18:43 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jul 2, 2022 at 18:59 | |||||
| Nov 24, 2016 at 1:52 | comment | added | niico | Unorthodox tactics? You have very heavy slow (not fast) vehicles with a super high centre of gravity on spindly little legs. A child could work out that you just need to put them off balance. Also, how did the AT-ATs get through the shield? If something that large can walk under it - craft could fly under it. More plot holes IMHO. | |
| Nov 23, 2016 at 21:23 | comment | added | PhasedOut | Too bad that V-150 Ion Cannon could not traverse low enough to fire on the AT-ATs. No Direct Suppression on Hoth. | |
| Jan 5, 2016 at 16:10 | comment | added | Cearon O'Flynn | @Deltharis surely the main cost that the Empire is trying to negate is the Time as opposed to man power. Being bogged down in a trench warfare would take time that the Empire didn't have, even with the speed of assault that the AT-AT gave, the rebels were able to evacuate their base. Any troops landed with the AT-AT would either be too slow to keep up with the AT-AT or too lightly armoured to survive against the snowspeeders. The rebels had no armaments to deal with the AT-ATs and it took unforeseeable unorthodox tactics to despatch a handful. | |
| Mar 14, 2015 at 12:23 | comment | added | Deltharis | I have one problem with that answer - that is, the assumption that the Empire cares about manpower costs. After all their space-dogfighting doctrine is based on cheap expendable TIEs in large numbers | |
| S Dec 18, 2014 at 8:22 | history | edited | SQB | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed grammar and improved formatting
|
| S Dec 18, 2014 at 8:22 | history | suggested | Agi Hammerthief | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed grammar and improved formatting
|
| Dec 18, 2014 at 7:48 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Dec 18, 2014 at 8:22 | |||||
| Dec 17, 2014 at 16:56 | history | answered | Himarm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |