Timeline for Why didn't the hotel's angels become real?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2021 at 18:13 | comment | added | FreeMan | You missed option 3: The writers forgot about The Time of the Angels, and option 4: The writers didn't care about The Time of the Angles. Continuity? What continuity? | |
| Feb 7, 2015 at 21:00 | comment | added | Zommuter | Both good points. I do tend to accept #1 more though, since otherwise there's no explanation why that book didn't contain at least a hand-drawn, very abstract image of an angel | |
| Feb 7, 2015 at 20:42 | history | edited | KutuluMike | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 13 characters in body
|
| Feb 7, 2015 at 20:41 | comment | added | KutuluMike | I tend to prefer #2 as well; we know those images came from the fears of people in the hotel, so the "images" were pulled from Gibbis' mind; it's not likely that he was thinking of two specific angels at the time, especially since his fear of them was of their race in general. | |
| Feb 7, 2015 at 20:31 | comment | added | Valorum | I like explanation #2 better | |
| Feb 7, 2015 at 20:03 | history | answered | KutuluMike | CC BY-SA 3.0 |