Skip to main content
Science Fiction & Fantasy

Return to Question

Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackSciFi/status/577945700362788865
Sybok was his half-brother; character development tag.
Source Link
EleventhDoctor
EleventhDoctor
  • 2.9k
  • 3
  • 30
  • 45

One of the frustrating aspects of Star Trek V: The Final Frontier is the vague and submissive conduct of Spock throughout, even taking into account the fact that Sybok is his brotherhalf-brother. It really does seem borderline whether Spock should still be working on a starship at all.

I was wondering whether there was an out-of-universe explanation to this, such as Leonard Nimoy's attitude to the part at the time, or decisions made by the directors.

One of the frustrating aspects of Star Trek V: The Final Frontier is the vague and submissive conduct of Spock throughout, even taking into account the fact that Sybok is his brother. It really does seem borderline whether Spock should still be working on a starship at all.

I was wondering whether there was an out-of-universe explanation to this, such as Leonard Nimoy's attitude to the part at the time, or decisions made by the directors.

One of the frustrating aspects of Star Trek V: The Final Frontier is the vague and submissive conduct of Spock throughout, even taking into account the fact that Sybok is his half-brother. It really does seem borderline whether Spock should still be working on a starship at all.

I was wondering whether there was an out-of-universe explanation to this, such as Leonard Nimoy's attitude to the part at the time, or decisions made by the directors.

Source Link
EleventhDoctor
EleventhDoctor
  • 2.9k
  • 3
  • 30
  • 45

Why does Spock come across as so vague and submissive throughout Star Trek V: The Final Frontier?

One of the frustrating aspects of Star Trek V: The Final Frontier is the vague and submissive conduct of Spock throughout, even taking into account the fact that Sybok is his brother. It really does seem borderline whether Spock should still be working on a starship at all.

I was wondering whether there was an out-of-universe explanation to this, such as Leonard Nimoy's attitude to the part at the time, or decisions made by the directors.