Timeline for Are AT-ATs MIFVs or tanks by design?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2015 at 21:03 | answer | added | Jeff | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 16, 2015 at 20:34 | vote | accept | DVK-on-Ahch-To | ||
| Mar 16, 2015 at 20:13 | history | edited | DVK-on-Ahch-To | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 48 characters in body
|
| Mar 16, 2015 at 20:12 | answer | added | Valorum | timeline score: 5 | |
| Mar 16, 2015 at 20:09 | comment | added | Null♦ | I don't think it's going to be possible to classify Star Wars military vehicles as we classify real world military vehicles. For example, in your linked question I posted a comment classifying the AT-AT as a tank + APC, and the AT-ST as an IFV (based on its weak armor) but with a very low troop carrying capacity. | |
| Mar 16, 2015 at 20:05 | comment | added | Null♦ | Thaddeus' answer in your linked question has a schematic (taken from Wookieepedia) which includes a labeled "troop section". The Wookieepedia articles also cites some non-canon references (e.g. Essential Guide to Vehicles) which support the "Transport" part of the name. | |
| Mar 16, 2015 at 19:59 | comment | added | DVK-on-Ahch-To | I'm aware of the separate question comparing them to tanks but IMHO none of the answers actually have canon proof that they weren't tanks but transports, in the first place. | |
| Mar 16, 2015 at 19:56 | history | asked | DVK-on-Ahch-To | CC BY-SA 3.0 |