Timeline for How does a wizard become powerful in the Harry Potter universe?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
17 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Jul 18, 2018 at 15:13 | history | suggested | Hermione Granger | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Hermione is a witch not a wizard
|
| Jul 18, 2018 at 15:04 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jul 18, 2018 at 15:13 | |||||
| Oct 6, 2017 at 21:11 | history | edited | Obsidia |
edited tags
|
|
| Oct 6, 2017 at 16:28 | answer | added | xrorox | timeline score: 0 | |
| Oct 6, 2017 at 14:15 | answer | added | King of NES | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 31, 2015 at 20:14 | answer | added | Mikasa | timeline score: 4 | |
| May 31, 2015 at 14:33 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackSciFi/status/605019235421691904 | ||
| May 31, 2015 at 8:57 | comment | added | Anthony Grist | Without fleshing it out to a proper answer, it seems to be mostly natural talent with hard work on top. If you look at three of the most powerful wizards from the series - Voldemort, Dumbledore and Snape - they're all shown as inventing new aspects of magic, not just being able to learn all of the already established spells that are taught at Hogwarts. | |
| May 31, 2015 at 2:05 | comment | added | JMFB | @DVK please see above | |
| May 31, 2015 at 2:05 | comment | added | JMFB | @Richard I read it. I edited parts of it, but it needs a lot more grammatical/spelling/sentence structure/etc. work. In addition, it only really scratches at the answer, and like you both mention it lacks anything canon. | |
| May 31, 2015 at 1:23 | comment | added | DVK-on-Ahch-To | @Richard - leaving aside poor canon backing for that answer, it really should be migrated to THIS question, as it doesn't really asnswer the linked one :) | |
| May 30, 2015 at 23:29 | comment | added | Valorum | @DVK - This answer would appear to answer the question above quite nicely, without more than the most superficial changes. | |
| May 30, 2015 at 23:21 | comment | added | DVK-on-Ahch-To | @Richard - don't think it's a dupe. That one asks what the definition of powerful is. This one seems to ask about the process to achieve that definition. A good answer to both would be quite different (though might use same quotes in places) | |
| May 30, 2015 at 23:16 | comment | added | Valorum | If you don't like the answers on the dupe, you have some choices. You could a) Seek clarification from the people who posted the existing answers OR b) Post a bounty with a custom reason ("I want more info about x") OR c) research and post your own answer. | |
| May 30, 2015 at 23:12 | comment | added | JMFB | @Richard Yes it is pretty much the same. I didn't see this one when searching or typing mine in. However, his question at least the supporting part, included nothing but his opinion of what the answer should be. He included no supporting in-canon examples of wizards, their abilities, and what his question meant. He didn't finish it off with clearly stating what the crux (pun intended) of his question was. The answers were all lacking, probably because he didn't really frame his question clearly. How do I ask a similar question and get some in-canon answers. I'm really curious about this. | |
| May 30, 2015 at 22:39 | comment | added | Valorum | Dupe of What determines the power of a wizard in Harry Potter's world? | |
| May 30, 2015 at 22:31 | history | asked | JMFB | CC BY-SA 3.0 |