Orbit of this planet wouldn't be stable because it would have to cross accretion disk or paths of particles falling from it into hole - it would cause significant drag and cause deorbitation - it would fall into black hole.

Also this photo seems inaccurate: being near photon sphere, planet would be much closer - in similar distance as inner edge of disk. Also probably too small to be seen from such perspective.

Orbit of this planet wouldn't be stable because it would have to cross accretion disk or paths of particles falling from it into hole - it would cause significant drag and cause deorbitation - it would fall into the black hole.

Another thing is that this photo seems inaccurate: being near photon sphere, planet would be much closer - in similar distance as inner edge of disk, probably too small to be seen from such perspective.

Even black hole itself doesn't look right for the scenario the movie creators cherry picked to have extreme time dilation on the planet - very high rotation rate of the black hole was needed and light coming from the disk would be distorted differently from what they used in the movie - a much lower rotation rate version of simulation of the black hole.

Orbit of this planet wouln't be stable becuse it would have to cross accretion disk or paths of particles falling from it into hole - it would cause significant drag and cause deorbitation - it would fall into black hole.

Also this photo seems inaccurate - being near photon sphere, planet would be much closer - in similar distance as inner edge of disk, also probably too small to be seen from such perspective

Orbit of this planet wouldn't be stable because it would have to cross accretion disk or paths of particles falling from it into hole - it would cause significant drag and cause deorbitation - it would fall into black hole.

Also this photo seems inaccurate: being near photon sphere, planet would be much closer - in similar distance as inner edge of disk. Also probably too small to be seen from such perspective.