Timeline for Why was a hobbit "the most unlikely creature imaginable" to pick up "The One Ring"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
27 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2017 at 2:21 | history | edited | user31178 |
edited tags
|
|
| Sep 4, 2014 at 18:08 | comment | added | Zibbobz | Perhaps because it was "an Unexpected Journey"? | |
| Sep 4, 2014 at 18:00 | answer | added | arynaq | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 18, 2012 at 10:26 | answer | added | n611x007 | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 19, 2012 at 3:23 | history | edited | Major Stackings | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Changed image with smaller image.
|
| May 18, 2012 at 0:38 | history | edited | Major Stackings | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added image
|
| Mar 26, 2012 at 23:29 | answer | added | phil | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 9, 2012 at 0:02 | history | edited | DVK-on-Ahch-To |
edited tags
|
|
| Jan 25, 2012 at 23:46 | comment | added | Dale | How often did a hobbit go wandering through the caves? The ring was much more likely to have been found by the inhabitants of the caves - goblins etc. | |
| Jan 25, 2012 at 4:44 | comment | added | Aram Kocharyan | "The ring did not intend" is an unusual phrase. While it's implied that the ring is an extension of its master and has a will to return to it, surely dropping onto the floor of the cave and being carried away would be the best way out, given that the ring moves much like a dying mollusc. | |
| Jan 24, 2012 at 20:35 | vote | accept | Major Stackings | ||
| Jan 24, 2012 at 20:28 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackSciFi/status/161908330204377088 | ||
| Jan 24, 2012 at 20:23 | vote | accept | Major Stackings | ||
| Jan 24, 2012 at 20:31 | |||||
| Jan 24, 2012 at 19:25 | answer | added | Nuno Freitas | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jan 24, 2012 at 19:21 | answer | added | zrvan | timeline score: 81 | |
| Jan 24, 2012 at 19:19 | answer | added | ThePrimeagen | timeline score: -5 | |
| Jan 24, 2012 at 15:46 | comment | added | Zoe | I think this is sort of a duplicate question of scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/6297/… | |
| Jan 24, 2012 at 15:09 | comment | added | Jon Purdy | @DanielRoseman: Specifically, he was a Stoor, a variety of Hobbit that had an affinity with men—as opposed to a Harfoot or Fallohide, who shared characteristics with dwarves and elves, respectively. | |
| Jan 24, 2012 at 14:36 | answer | added | Michael Brown | timeline score: 15 | |
| Jan 24, 2012 at 12:58 | comment | added | Daniel Roseman | Point of clarification: Smeagol wasn't "hobbit-like", he was actually a hobbit. "I guess he was of hobbit-kind" means that he was of the same "kind" - ie race - as the hobbits that Frodo knew. | |
| Jan 24, 2012 at 11:58 | comment | added | Loïc Wolff | I've took the liberty to retag the question, since I think "the-hobbit" refers to the prequel of LOTR and the part you mention is in The Fellowship of the Ring. | |
| Jan 24, 2012 at 11:56 | history | edited | Loïc Wolff |
edited tags
|
|
| S Jan 24, 2012 at 11:46 | history | suggested | dlanod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Cleaned up a bit
|
| Jan 24, 2012 at 9:11 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jan 24, 2012 at 11:46 | |||||
| Jan 24, 2012 at 8:14 | answer | added | Bertrand Moreau | timeline score: 81 | |
| Jan 24, 2012 at 7:33 | answer | added | Mike Scott | timeline score: 24 | |
| Jan 24, 2012 at 7:05 | history | asked | Major Stackings | CC BY-SA 3.0 |