Timeline for Why did Gollum ever take off the ring in the first place?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2022 at 17:47 | history | edited | DavidW | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Fix spelling of Tolkien
|
| Jan 26, 2012 at 14:27 | comment | added | Christopher Donlan | lol, too true: infinite energy, mutable information, morals existing in costless societies. Anyways, if I were a wizard, my best spell would be: "Mea Culpum" | |
| Jan 26, 2012 at 14:22 | comment | added | Kevin | Yes, I know. Just a little comparison. We all know JKR only sticks to the theories she likes. | |
| Jan 26, 2012 at 14:21 | comment | added | Christopher Donlan | Anyways, in the case of J.K. Rowling, you do need a soul to survive. That was the whole point of the Horcruxes: as long as a piece of Voldemort's soul remained, he could continue to exist. Comon man, get your geek on. | |
| Jan 26, 2012 at 14:16 | comment | added | Christopher Donlan | Lol. I'm not citing it as a "fact"... I think that you have to consider who Tolkien's contemporaries were: C.S. Lewis etc. In the early 20th century, there was a movement back towards fundamental western beliefs...and literary guys like C.S. Lewis and J.R.R. Tolkien were at the center of that reactionism. Check out the screwtape letters and tell me that Socrates, Westernism, and the New Testament isn't all over that. Then, consider that C.S. Lewis and J.R.R. Tolkien were both hugely popular literary contemporaries. | |
| Jan 26, 2012 at 3:23 | comment | added | Kevin | "According to Socrates (my philosophy 101 class) you must have a soul to be alive." According to J.K. Rowling, you don't. | |
| Jan 26, 2012 at 2:53 | history | edited | Christopher Donlan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 361 characters in body
|
| Jan 26, 2012 at 2:43 | history | answered | Christopher Donlan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |