8

At the end of the first book,

And on far-off Earth, Dr. Carlisle Perera had as yet told no one how he had wakened from a restless sleep with the message from his subconscious still echoing in his brain: The Ramans do everything in threes.

This may be an obvious question. I haven't read the two books written by Gentry Lee and only vaguely remember the original series. Please tell me the appropriate book in case it is mentioned.

6
  • 2
    For the same reason we do everything in tens.
    – John O
    Commented Aug 30, 2012 at 12:10
  • @John O: Did they have three fingers total?
    – vsz
    Commented Aug 30, 2012 at 14:16
  • 3
    Yes, one and a half fingers on each hand.
    – John O
    Commented Aug 30, 2012 at 14:17
  • 3
    Don't read the sequels if your time is at all valuable to you. Commented Aug 24, 2015 at 12:11
  • 1
    Bah. The sequels are fine. Significantly different from the first book, but fine, especially Rama II. Now, Bowl of Heaven (different author) is so bad it's a wonder any publisher was willing to go near it.
    – Matthew
    Commented Jul 9, 2020 at 14:12

5 Answers 5

16

I don't believe that there is an explanation for why the Ramans do everything in threes. Arthur C. Clarke wrote, in the afterword to Rama II, that the words you quote from the end of the first book "were a last minute afterthought when I was doing the final revision". If you do a Google book search for "three" or "threes" in the Rama books, you'll find some few mentions of the humans observing instances of this ternary priciple in the work of the Ramans during the four novels, but no explanations are given in the text surrounding those search results. Just as we never see the Ramans themselves, this principle of threes and what Nicole "understands" in her moment of death at the end of the last volume, remain unsolved mysteries. From my experience with Clarke, I would assume that these are intentional mysteries with no real solution, that serve as a storytelling device the function of which is to create a sense of spiritual truth beyond human understanding: the religion in science fiction.

4
  • 1
    Thanks for the answer. While Arthur C. Clarke may have just thought about it at the last minute, I was actually wondering if the books were saying that Rama is at par with God (Holy trinity and so on) Commented Aug 31, 2012 at 0:18
  • 2
    No. There is definitely no reference to the christian holy trinity in the Rama novels. The threes are a design principle.
    – user30564
    Commented Aug 31, 2012 at 6:29
  • 2
    I'd also like to mention that the spider-like robots on Rama have a body with three legs and a general three-fold symmetry.
    – b_jonas
    Commented Sep 2, 2012 at 9:25
  • 1
    Yes, and the humans find a spacesuit for a three-legged being that reminds them of the "Spider". They wonder if this was a suit for a Raman, but they come to no definite conclusion. (The astronauts say that the Ramans probably build their robots in their own image, just like we humans do, but then there are other kinds of robots with different shapes on Rama, just as on our Earth, so no indication. And we later learn that the cylinders were not meant for the Ramans to travel in themselves, so the spacesuit must have been for one of the intelligent races the Ramans wished to observe.)
    – user30564
    Commented Sep 2, 2012 at 9:53
8

The impression I got from the first book was that Raman engineering (as ours) required important systems to be fault-tolerant. The fact that triple modular redundancy was routine, I think, was meant to inspire awe as the kind of resources they could command, and the reliability of their constructions.

I don't recall a obsession for threes besides engineering. More so, Dr. Perera's quote went unfulfilled, as there were only two visits with the same purpose and trajectory. The third one had a different purpose and trajectory.

So they don't always do everything in threes, they just routinely do triple redundancy.

3
  • A three legged robot isn't redundant at all, any more than a two legged man is doubly redundant.
    – Oldcat
    Commented Dec 2, 2014 at 22:40
  • Hey, maybe it can jump on one leg.
    – ASalazar
    Commented Dec 9, 2014 at 21:38
  • Ramans would just make 3 robots Commented Feb 26, 2021 at 2:02
2

If I remember correctly, the scout droids had three legs and later on, in Rama they found a suit that seemed to be fitted for three hands. To me it seemed that their physiology had triple redundancy. Just like ours seems to have double redundancy: two arms, two legs, two eyes, and so on. This carries some side effects/abilities when properly combines such as 3-D vision and sound localization and so on.

Anyhow, it maybe that the triple redundancy and triple everything in many of Rama's constructions and biodroids reflected the biology of the Ramans.

It could mean that due to this triple redundancy, a second and third Raman ship should be expected unless it already has gone through undetected. In other words, there maybe other chances for the Ramans to meet the human race.

1
  • The novel also describes at least one of the "cities" the crew explore as being divided into three identical parts, and these parts further divided into three identical parts.
    – gmw
    Commented Jan 20, 2018 at 22:27
-1

The literary reference is to systems with a periodicity of 3, which are very special in the Chaos theory admired by the author. Clark made a documentary about fractals and other chaotic phenomena called The Color of Infinity in 1995.

-1

Probably as fail safe? Probably they figured 3 virtually ensures the task is succeeded without leaving stuff to chances.

In an unrelated note, It's what we do with databases replication to ensure high availability

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.