62

At the end of ‘The Return of the King’, Bilbo, Frodo, Gandalf and others boarded a boat and left Middle-earth for Valinor.

Is there any canon explanation why they couldn’t just take the ring there in the first place and leave Middle-earth altogether? Would Sauron have gone after them? Couldn’t the elves living there safeguard it?

I do realize that without Frodo taking the ring to Mount Doom there would be no story at all, but I wonder whether or not there is any canon explanation for this.

1
  • 5
    Some speculation: ring is known to tempt at least Maiar (see Gandalf reaction to Frodo offering ring or Saruman). So it's possible that the solution would be relatively short term (until someone - elf or Maiar - would claim it). That might be explanation of what Elrond said (see BMWurm answer). Commented Aug 1, 2014 at 13:46

5 Answers 5

118

Elrond says so in the council:

“But Gandalf has revealed to us that we cannot destroy it by any craft that we here possess,” said Elrond. “And they who dwell beyond the Sea would not receive it: for good or ill it belongs to Middle-earth; it is for us who still dwell here to deal with it.” -FotR, Book 2, Ch.2.

Basically, since Sauron made it in Middle-Earth they have to deal with it there. Additionally there is concern of it being intercepted by creatures in league with Sauron while on the sea, I seem to recall.

EDIT: As Daniel Roseman pointed out in the comments (along with a nice quote from the book), it is unlikely they would have made it even that far, considering they would have to go back on the very road whence they came, and they barely survived that (at least in Frodo's case):

'And that we shall not find on the roads to the Sea,' said Galdor. 'If the return to Iarwain be thought too dangerous, then flight to the Sea is now fraught with gravest peril. My heart tells me that Sauron will expect us to take the western way, when he learns what has befallen. He soon will. The Nine have been unhorsed indeed but that is but a respite, ere they find new steeds and swifter.' -FotR, Book 2, Ch.2.

Lord Elrond himself follows it up with the explaination why fleeing back towards the sea is such a bad idea:

'The westward road seems easiest. Therefore it must be shunned. It will be watched. Too often the Elves have fled that way. Now at this last we must take a hard road, a road unforeseen. There lies our hope, if hope it be.' -FotR, Book 2, Ch.2.

9
  • 29
    Also, it would not make the problem (Sauron) go away. Even without the Ring, Sauron was becoming very powerful.
    – Dennis_E
    Commented Jul 31, 2014 at 9:12
  • 3
    Indeed, with or without the Ring, Sauron's victory was inevitable.
    – Shamshiel
    Commented Jul 31, 2014 at 9:53
  • 24
    The concern is not of it being intercepted on the Sea, but on the way there, as Galdor of the Havens says at the Council: "If the return to Iarwain be thought too dangerous, then flight to the Sea is now fraught with gravest peril. My heart tells me that Sauron will expect us to take the western way, when he learns what has befallen." Commented Jul 31, 2014 at 14:36
  • 3
    @Dennis_E - you should make this an answer; it's a very valid point.
    – user8719
    Commented Jul 31, 2014 at 21:45
  • 4
    > Additionally there is concern of it being intercepted by creatures in league with Sauron while on the sea, I seem to recall. - you recall wrong. Besides Elrond's words quoted above no more is sad about the journey across the sea. The only possible mention of such things are in the next paragraph: Glorfindel wants to cast it into the deeps and Gandalf answers "There are many things in the deep waters; and seas and lands may change".
    – chx
    Commented Feb 24, 2016 at 15:58
27

It has already been pointed out in BMWurm’s answer why neither elf nor wizard considered trying to take the ring west sensible, and that the peoples of Middle-earth would have to deal with the ring by themself, eventually, because Valar intervention would not be an option: “And they who dwell beyond the Sea would not receive it: for good or ill it belongs to Middle-earth; it is for us who still dwell here to deal with it.” Still, this doesn’t explain why that is the case — and the reason for it is, in my opinion, is the real answer and the most important fact, being directly related to the entire genesis of Middle-earth.

As we have already seen in the past, each Age was related to one “scale” of epic conflict — while the First Age was an obvious “Epic-est Fight of Valar & Elves vs Melkor”, with the greatest scale of both conflict and damage, the Second Age was “Epic-er Fight of Elves & Humans (Númenóreans) vs Sauron”; on the other hand, the Third Age was “Epic-ish Story of Couple of Battles of Humans & what’s left of everybody else vs what’s left of Sauron” — it’s the obvious road to the concept of the Dominion of Men that would follow in the Fourth Age. That was the plan of Eru from the very beginning, and, obviously, it required Men to deal with the remnants of the past to forge their future, one way or another. As such, while divine intervention was not only possible, but happened as a straight fact (Great Eagles' help, Gandalf being reborn, etc.) — it was Men (well, in a strange alliance with all the remaining sentient races of Middle-earth) who finally defeated Sauron (in the military sense) — and the Hobbits who won the fight in the broader sense — as such, fulfilling their destiny by setting their future. Yes, it was their destiny to create their destiny — as opposed to the Elves, obviously.

Also, note that this is strictly parallel to the storytelling aspect of any epic work — signifying that it’s not only an in-world reason, but an artist’s reason too — it happened the way it should happen to make the most of the story — because the story was meant to go the most expressive way (see other epic works, from Homer for example). Also, see Tree and Leaf — as JRR Tolkien explains this concept there to some extent, being parallel to Jesus Christ’s death — it has to happen, because it’s for greater good and because God has planned it this way. To extrapolate (since Valinor was a “heaven” of sorts from Human point of view) — asking The Ring (the source of sin) to be taken to Valinor was similar to asking God to take away sin/plague/some source of evil from Earth to Heaven — it was impossible, because it would, in a way, rob Man of their destiny to forge their free will.

Therefore he willed that the hearts of Men ... should have a virtue to shape their life, amid the powers and chances of the world, beyond the Music of the Ainur.

NB: if somebody would be so nice as to provide me with some more source citations (I’m too lazy/busy to dig for them) to back it up, I’d be very grateful.

Summary

Valinor was not an option, because Eru explicitly made it Man’s sole choice/possibility to be able to forge their destiny by defeating Sauron in the Last-est Alliance of Middle-Earth — bringing The Ring to Valinor and throwing the potato at Elves/Valar was thus not an option.

5
  • Also doesnt it say in The Silmarillion that the Valar had learnt that intervening directly with the affairs of middle earth was dangerous
    – turinsbane
    Commented Aug 25, 2014 at 18:18
  • @turinsbane while I completely agree with you about the fact you stated, I find it only lateral to the real issue here - Valar not only had learnt that divine interventions were risky - they knew it from the very beginning. They just took the risk back then, mostly because of Melkor's direct attack to Valinor and his rising power, and took the fight to him, resulting in huge collateral damage - and were smart enough to not decimate ME again just because of some Maia with a bunch of orcs that the sentient races could deal with themselves.
    – user24069
    Commented May 5, 2015 at 11:16
  • Interesting theory though I disagree with your description of Sauron plus the Valar sent the Istari to deal with Sauron they didn't just leave ME to deal with him by themselves
    – turinsbane
    Commented Jun 18, 2015 at 8:20
  • 3
    @turinsbane the Biblical parallels are quite visible in Tolkien's works. Istari were sent the very same way God sent Jesus (or prophets, if we're talking Judaism) - to make it possible for Men to deal with the sin; yet it was still the Men's sole responsibility to deal with the sin [i.e. The Ring]. Going along this lines, sending Valar to ME would be similar to sending a legion of archangels to save Jesus from Romans... as to Sauron, compared to Melkor & Ungoliant, "Maia with a bunch of orcs" is the only fitting description I could find. It's The Ring that's the real danger here, not S.
    – user24069
    Commented Jun 18, 2015 at 11:39
  • One aspect of Men forging their own fate is that neither Eru (ie. God) nor the Valar (i.e., angels) were going to do anything that Men could do for themselves, at least not in any overt way. It is hinted that Bilbo finding the Ring was Eru's doing. Frodo did all that he could, and once that was done, somebody made Gollumn have a whoopsie on the edge of the Cracks of Doom.
    – EvilSnack
    Commented Mar 31, 2022 at 23:21
15

It would not make the problem (Sauron) go away. Even without the Ring, Sauron was becoming too powerful and was ready to conquer Middle Earth. And as others have said, The Valar would not receive the Ring. Destroying the Ring was really their only option.

This was the conclusion that was reached at the Council of Elrond, after they debated every option.

4

The Valar and Maiar, had come to Middle-Earth at the end of the First Age, to defeat Morgoth, the original Dark Lord, in the War of Wrath.

After the First Age, the Ainur swore to never again, directly interfere with Middle-Earth.

This oath, was the reason why they sent the Wizards.

3

Also, since Sauron is a Maiar spirit who sided with Melkor (a Valar - god - who turned bad in ages past but was finally defeated by the assembled forces of the rest of the gods). One might argue that Sauron would simply go to Valinor as well and the fighting would spread to there.

1
  • 30
    The last time he caused an invasion of Valinor that did not end so well for him.
    – Taemyr
    Commented Jul 31, 2014 at 11:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.