8

Hagrid is not shown casting a Patronus anywhere in the series, but still he was an Order member, and Order members usually communicate by means of a Patronus. Is there any indication that Hagrid was able to cast a Patronus, and if so, what was its form?

  • Hagrid probably is not skilled enough to cast a patronus, he also only has a broken wand, but it would be a dragon for sure. – Himarm Sep 9 '15 at 17:46
  • 1
    @Himarm There's no 'probably' about it. This question isn't primarily opinion-based; there's a canon answer for heaven's sake! – Rand al'Thor Sep 9 '15 at 17:47
  • 1
    Welcome to the SciFi/Fantasy Stack Exchange! I have edited your question to remove the request for speculation, as we generally don't allow speculative/opinionated questions on this site. Please let me know if you have any issues with my changes. – KutuluMike Sep 9 '15 at 17:51
  • @MikeEdenfield I was just doing the same when your edit loaded! You did that damn apostrophe wrong again though :-) – Rand al'Thor Sep 9 '15 at 17:52
  • 2
    @Astant it is its for possessive form of it, and it is it's for the contraction it is. – Himarm Sep 9 '15 at 18:02
13

Hagrid could not produce a Patronus.

Word-of-JKR, discussed here and here, originally on Twitter here:

Hagrid couldn't produce a Patronus. It's a very difficult spell.

Since Hagrid was expelled before completing his studies at Hogwarts, it makes sense that - like many grown-up witches and wizards, in fact - he never learnt the difficult Patronus Charm. Some have also speculated that due to his unhappy childhood, he didn't have enough happy memories to draw on in order to cast it.

  • 12
    "Some have also speculated that due to his unhappy childhood, he didn't have enough happy memories to draw on in order to cast it." I don't know about that. Snape made one just fine, and his upbringing was depressing as hell. – TenthJustice Sep 9 '15 at 18:05
  • @TenthJustice Yeah, I don't agree with that either. Just thought I'd put it out there though. – Rand al'Thor Sep 9 '15 at 18:06
  • 2
    @TenthJustice Snape’s a sourpuss git to begin with. ‘Happy thoughts’ probably means something slightly different to him, like a fantasy about a cauldron of Boil-Ballooning potion blowing up in Neville or Hermione’s face… – Janus Bahs Jacquet Sep 9 '15 at 18:29
  • 9
    Harry's childhood also wasn't exactly full of glitter and puppies, but he was able to produce a full bodied Patronus – Xantec Sep 9 '15 at 19:00
  • 1
    @JanusBahsJacquet That, or his memories with/of Lily :'( – Konayuki Sep 10 '15 at 3:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.