It is mentioned that Melkor is the most powerful of the Valar, so what stopped him making his own race? What held him back?

The Orcs don't count as he simply modified the elves.

  • 18
    Because he's not Eru Ilúvatar.
    – Wad Cheber
    Commented Sep 28, 2015 at 2:21
  • FWIW, Tolkien originally had Morgoth creating his own race(s). And then changed his mind during the writing of Lord of the Rings that this shouldn't be possible in his invented world (which he wanted to be compatible with his beliefs about our own world). Commented Apr 26 at 6:22

5 Answers 5


Creation of living thinking beings is explicitly something that can only be done by Eru. Even when Aulë tried, in creating the Dwarves, he succeeded only in creating puppets, until Eru himself gave them life. There is no reason to think that Melkor would have been able to do this, even if he had tried.


As Daniel Roseman says, the ability to create what Tolkien calls "rational incarnate" life is solely given to Eru Ilúvatar, the capital-G God of Tolkien's Legendarium. No matter how hard he tried, Morgoth simply didn't have the power to grant souls to his creations. Tolkien draws an explicit comparison to Aulë and his dwarves in an essay printed in Morgoth's Ring, titled "Orcs":

Melkor was impotent to produce any living thing, but skilled in corruption of things that did not proceed from himself, if he could dominate them. But if he had indeed attempted to make creatures of his own in imitation or mockery of the Incarnates [Elves and Men], he would, like Aulë, only succeeded in producing puppets: his creatures would have acted only when the attention of his will was upon them, and they would have shown no reluctance to execute any command of his, even if it were to destroy themselves.

History of Middle-earth X Morgoth's Ring Part 5: "Myths Transformed" Chapter X "Orcs"

Which isn't to say he didn't give it the old college try; as Ainulindalë says, Melkor spent a great deal of "time"1 searching for the Flame Imperishable, which he believed would grant him this power:

To Melkor among the Ainur had been given the greatest gifts of power and knowledge, and he had a share in all the gifts of his brethren. He had gone often alone into the void places seeking the Imperishable Flame; for desire grew hot within him to bring into Being things of his own, and it seemed to him that Ilúvatar took no thought for the Void, and he was impatient of its emptiness. Yet he found not the Fire, for it is with Ilúvatar.

The Silmarillion I Ainulindalë

He's right, of course: the Flame Imperishable would grant him that power. Unfortunately, it's not something he can acquire. As Tolkien says, it is with Ilúvatar, and Ilúvatar alone.

1 Velociraptor air quotes here because time doesn't really make sense in the Timeless Halls

  • 4
    +1 Probably a tangentially related question, but... why didn't Melkor create armies of mindless puppets, if only to complement his other armies? Even an army of mindless robots who only act on his command would have been tremendously useful.
    – Andres F.
    Commented Sep 28, 2015 at 2:39
  • 7
    @AndresF. Because of how much of his power he'd have to expend on animating them; he did this to a certain extent with a small number of orcs, and with some of his other creatures, and that dispersal of his powers made him weak enough to overthrow Commented Sep 28, 2015 at 2:48
  • 1
    @JasonBaker I was always under the impression that he was only overthrown when Tulkas entered Arda as he "tipped the balance of power". Maybe this is primarily an opinion based point, however I can see a case for diminishing powers, since it's written in one of the letters somewhere (I think if I remember rightly), that Sauron's powers were diminished by bending the will of lesser beings. Is there any other canon stuff that directly relates to Morgoth losing power as he twisted each being?
    – John Bell
    Commented Sep 30, 2015 at 13:22
  • 2
    @JohnBell We're talking about different moments in time; you're right that Tulkas was the reason for Morgoth's defeat in the very early days, but I'm talking about his final defeat at the end of the First Age. As to canon, yes; my comment above is inspired by part of the same "Orcs" essay I reference in my answer, and related to the idea that the whole of Arda was "Morgoth's Ring". That is, he put so much of his own power into it, in an effort to dominate and control it, that he became vulnerable Commented Sep 30, 2015 at 13:51

He did make his own race(s). He made trolls and dragons, possibly wargs.

From those three pages:

[Trolls are] Devised or corrupted by Morgoth in the First Age (believed by Treebeard to be "made in mockery" of Ents)

When Morgoth saw how strong the Noldor were in battle, he realized that Orcs alone were insufficient for defeating his enemies. His solution, breeding a new race of monsters: Dragons.

Wargs were an evil breed of demonic wolves, suggesting that they were inhabited by evil spirits. The origin of the breed is unknown - perhaps they were among the creatures bred by Morgoth in the Elder Days.

  • The primary problem with this answer is that "bred", and "corrupted", are not the same as "created" in the context of this question (and maybe not "devised" either). See e.g. discussion here.
    – Ben Bolker
    Commented Apr 26 at 14:41

Melkor probably could have created his own race, if he were willing to use the same methods that the Valar did. But the Valar's methods were unacceptable to Melkor, and that put a self-imposed limit on what he could do.

The big thing to understand about Melkor is that his greatest wish is to act completely independently of Eru Iluvatar. He believes that in order to do this, he must do something that Eru does not allow him to do. He first tried to do this by modifying the Music, but he was frustrated when Eru simply incorporated those modifications. Now, what would satisfy him most would be to create free-willed beings without Eru allowing it.

Melkor was indeed the strongest of the Ainur. Technically he wasn't one of the Valar (which was more of an organization than a subrace of the Ainur), though he rivalled even them in power. Several of the Valar created living beings, and even Melkor is said to have created some monsters.

But there is one power that no Ainur has, not even Melkor: the Flame Imperishable, which bestows sentience on living things. None of the living things created by the Ainur were sentient until Eru "adopted" them, using the Flame to awaken minds in these creatures. Even the Dwarves and the Ents were not sentient until this time, as Eru points out.

This makes Eru a sort of gatekeeper: a being of sufficient power might create new plant and animal life, but to create an entirely new race of sentient beings requires not just his permission, but an explicit act on his part to grant them sentience. The Valar's method, therefore, effectively requires asking Eru's permission. Melkor does not have it, and more to the point, he does not want it. From Melkor's perspective, asking Eru for permission would defeat the whole purpose of the exercise: his creations would then be Eru's creatures, not his. So Melkor thinks, anyway.

Melkor believed that if he could find the Flame, he might be able to create sentient life without Eru's permission, but he never managed to find it. This isn't for lack of trying on his part. Most of his efforts were spent in a past so distant that time had no real meaning, but it is said that he was mighty and persistent in his search. But to no avail. Since he could not find the Flame, and would not borrow it from Eru, the creation of sentient life was closed to him.

Since that was not an option, Melkor set out to do what he considered the next best thing: he corrupted the existing creations. It did not satisfy him, because he was never able to ignore the fact that these were still Eru's creations, even if twisted by Melkor's will. He feared them for that reason, even as he used them. But they would have to do.

  • 3
    The Valar were also not capable of creating their own race of independent beings. The Dwarves were 'sentient' only because Eru made them so. Commented Sep 29, 2015 at 14:06
  • @DJClayworth: I mentioned that. The Dwarves, as created by Aule, were not sentient beings: it was only after Eru "adopted" them that they became sentient. In essence, Eru gave permission after the fact. Commented Sep 29, 2015 at 15:28
  • 3
    Yes, and that makes your first sentence wrong. Commented Sep 29, 2015 at 15:40
  • @DJClayworth: No, it doesn't. The Valar's method involves getting permission from Eru (Aule only did so after the fact, but the Dwarves were still not sentient until Eru allowed it). This need for permission is what makes it unacceptable to Melkor. Commented Sep 29, 2015 at 15:46
  • 4
    Eru did not just "give permission", before or after the fact, to make the Dwarves sentient. Eru had to make them into sentient beings. Without that they could not be sentient, whatever permission was given. Commented Sep 29, 2015 at 15:53

Because Tolkien probably believed that in real life creating life was utterly impossible and therefore could be done only by God Almighty who could work miracles.

Thus Tolkien made that the rule in his fictional universe of Arda, especially since it was supposed to be our world thousands of years ago.

In the earliest versions Melkor could create life, but as Tolkien made his legendarium more and more serious he made it more consistent with his Catholic theology and so Melkor could only modify life.

Of course once life already existed that was not really much of a limitation on Melkor since he now had the raw materials to modify in any way he saw fit.

Of course it seem pretty obvious that scientifically speaking in the real world creating life is not something terribly difficult or impossible and thus any theology which claims that God Almighty is the only person who can create life is certain to be proven wrong in just a few decades or centuries. So writers of future epic fantasy works need not imitate that feature of Tolkien's legendarium.

  • 4
    I agree with your last paragraph, but I fear it's likely to attract downvotes... It also seems a bit extraneous to the question.
    – Andres F.
    Commented Sep 28, 2015 at 2:41
  • 7
    Last paragraph is off-topic and inaccurate-- There is a distinction between creating "life" and "'rational incarnate' life", or essentially sentient beings with free will, which is what this question is really asking.
    – San Diago
    Commented Sep 28, 2015 at 14:45
  • 3
    @Alice As much as I might agree with the idea that we're just biological machines, "sentience is merely an algorithm" doesn't at all follow from "life is Turing-complete". Besides, the general existence of God/souls/whatever can't be disproved. There is no sense getting into that kind of discussion here, it's thoroughly out of scope. Commented Sep 28, 2015 at 21:50
  • Third para would be improved by concrete references.
    – AakashM
    Commented Sep 29, 2015 at 8:00
  • The most astute debater of Tolkien's works would surely come prepared with a Ph.D in Theology, Philosophy and Politics, just so we can delight in Tolkien's (accidentally on purpose) allegory ;) Sometimes these discussions get far too deep.
    – John Bell
    Commented Sep 30, 2015 at 13:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.