I looked around and couldn't find a duplicate for this question.

I don't have the books on me, but I remember Nearly Headless Nick mentioning that he was not allowed to hang out with the actually headless ghosts, because he was, well, nearly headless. His head was still attached by some "skin". My question is, given his inability to interact with normal matter, is it ever possible for him to become completely headless? Is there a spell, or something else, that could potentially remove his head? Or are ghosts permanently stuck in the physicality they had when they became ghosts?

And as a follow-up question, what would happen to his head? Would it simply disappear, or would it become some kind of ghostly waste? Would it simply hang around wherever Nick left it, or would it be the true ghost and his body go to waste?

Looking for as many canonical sources as you can find!

  • 1
    interesting, according to scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/11020/… ghosts seem to be able to interact with each other psychically, so maybe a ghost hatchet could finish the job?
    – Himarm
    Oct 6, 2015 at 15:38
  • That was one thought I had - in which case, could Nick himself pull his own head off? Again, no book on me, but I remember him exclaiming something along the lines of "it's just held on by a thread!" - would it be too painful for him to do? Do they feel pain?
    – Jake
    Oct 6, 2015 at 15:41
  • shes kinda fuzzy on her ghost lore, but i think by her phsyics it could happen, but at the same time, the whole point of nearly headless nick is that he cant have it happen.lol
    – Himarm
    Oct 6, 2015 at 15:48
  • 3
    I won't answer since I can't think of a canon source, but I would say that since he clearly wants his head off (he's been angling after joining the headless hunt for years) and since he's had access to some of the brightest wizards of the last few hundred years, I'd argue that he can't chop his head off, nor can it be accomplished by magic.
    – Valorum
    Oct 6, 2015 at 17:28
  • It's a fine argument - if he could, he would have already. Strange that that wasn't fleshed out in the books, though - my first question when I read it all those years ago was "So why doesn't someone chop it off?" but I assumed it would be answered by the time the books finished
    – Jake
    Oct 6, 2015 at 17:46

2 Answers 2


Highly Unlikely.

We have this quote from Pottermore - Ghosts:

No physical pleasure remains to them

This most likely refers to the fact that their body can feel no pleasure, even through interaction with themselves. This fact I feel is evidenced in the Deathday Party scene.

(...) the Fat Friar, a cheerful Hufflepuff ghost, who was talking to a knight with an arrow sticking out of his forehead.

Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets

Now from this two things can be garnered, weapons left stuck into the body when dying also become part of the ghost and this ghost did not remove the arrow.

You may ask if he could remove the arrow, why would he want to? I also pose that IF he could remove the arrow, Nick could use it to slice the single strain of sinew keeping his head attached.

Considering it's been 500 years since his death it is likely as @Richard said that he explored all the options available to him.

Like @Randal'thor I shall also mention @DVK's answer here but for different purposes. In it we see that he mentions Headless Hockey and Headless Polo, presumably this is Hockey and Polo using heads instead of balls. From this we can take that ghosts can receive no further damage otherwise each member of the Headless Hunt would be the owner of a severely battered and mostly destroyed head.

TL:DR Very unlikely ghosts can take any further physical damage to their bodies.

†: Nick does get petrified but I would not consider this physical damage.

  • Isn't this just saying basically the same as my answer?
    – Rand al'Thor
    Oct 7, 2015 at 9:30
  • @randal'thor I feel i point out additional sources of evidence and have different talking points, but yes we do have the same viewpoint. Oct 7, 2015 at 11:58
  • Thank you very much for your answer! Although it appears there is enough evidence for this conclusion in the book, it's slightly strange that a character introduced in the first book, who has a somewhat prominent role for a side character, never has his physics fully explained - as I mentioned in another comment, my first reaction to learning of Nearly Headless Nick was "So...just get rid of his head!" but never actually received a canon explanation for why he cannot.
    – Jake
    Oct 7, 2015 at 13:05
  • 1
    Perhaps you could add a link to the Pottermore source?
    – SQB
    Oct 8, 2015 at 13:35

Probably not.

Ghosts do not have a physical body: they are merely spiritual shades of what used to be people. Their corpse can be treated in the same way as any other, and the physical bodies of most of the ghosts we encounter in the series must have decayed long ago. So it seems that the visible form taken by a ghost is what their body looked like at the moment of death: hence Nearly Headless Nick looks as he did just after he was executed, not the mouldering skeleton he physically became afterwards. For the same reason, ghosts retain the clothes they were wearing when they died: hence Nearly Headless Nick never changed out of his Elizabethan ruff into something more appropriate to this day and age.

Given this assumption, it's clear that his ghostly appearance can never change: he'll always be nearly headless.

This doesn't contradict DVK's answer here, since the games he mentions involve ghostly interaction but not any change in the 'bodies' of the ghosts involved, since their heads are already detached.

As Richard pointed out in a comment, it also stands to reason that Nearly Headless Nick would have got himself properly beheaded if he could. He spent several hundred years hanging out in a whole building full of witches and wizards, including some of the greatest of their age such as Dumbledore. If they couldn't tell him how to get his head entirely removed, nobody could; and if they could, he would presumably have done it, since nearly headlessness is his main grievance in life death.

As for your bonus question (which admittedly is now hypothetical only), consider the completely headless ghosts, such as those involved in the Headless Hunt. They get on perfectly well in life death with their heads detached from their bodies, and neither head nor body goes to waste; both remain part of the ghost, able to move and communicate.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.