7

It always bothered me that they needed the wands to do magic. In the first film/book, before Harry went to Hogwarts, there were instances of him using magic unintentionally without the use of a wand (such as turning his teacher's wig blue).

Why do they need them? Are there any that don't need them to intentionally use magic, if so, why?

Clarification edit: I mean are there any that are able to do magic well without the use of a wand?

  • 1
    There are a number of witches and wizards who can do wandless magic, including harry, who does it in the zoo. – phantom42 Oct 12 '15 at 14:08
  • @phantom42 I'd estimate that approximately 100% of people who attended Hogwarts have performed at least one piece of wandless magic. – Anthony Grist Oct 12 '15 at 14:09
  • I guess I should clarify, are there any that perform wandless magic well? The fact that neither Dumbledore nor Voldemort did this lead me to believe none can or its at least not worth attempting. – Captain Man Oct 12 '15 at 14:47
  • 1
    Well, why does a conductor need a baton to conduct an orchestra well? – Misha R Oct 12 '15 at 15:10
  • 1
    @CaptainMan Nah, baton's a good thing. It basically turns the conductor's arm into a longer arm with an extra joint. Makes the conductors gesturework larger, grander, quicker. He/she (although currently the world of conductors is a tragic sausagefest) could certainly use a finger, or just hands instead, but couldn't be quite as expressive or precise. My guess is that the conductor's relation to the orchestra is not so different from a wizard's relation to magic. – Misha R Oct 12 '15 at 15:46
5

Witches and Wizards use wands to help channel magic.

I would imagine that European wizards like Harry who are used to always having a wand when performing magic, would find it difficult to do so otherwise. However, in some other of the globe, wands are rarely, if ever, used.

The wand is a European invention, and while African witches and wizards have adopted it as a useful tool in the last century, many spells are cast simply by pointing the finger or through hand gestures.
(Pottermore - Uagadou)

Some wizards are able to do magic well without the use of a wand

The magic wand originated in Europe. Wands channel magic so as to make its effects both more precise and more powerful, although it is generally held to be a mark of the very greatest witches and wizards that they have also been able to produce wandless magic of a very high quality. As the Native American Animagi and potion-makers demonstrated, wandless magic can attain great complexity, but Charms and Transfiguration are very difficult without one.
(Pottermore - History of Magic in North America)

  • 1
    Wow. I did not know that. – Adamant Feb 12 '16 at 8:06
  • 2
    This is very new Pottermore writing so it's no wonder few people know it. :) but it is very important as far as the "rules of the universe" are concerned. – Pwassonne Feb 12 '16 at 8:37
  • 1
    @Pwassonne I have updated my answer to keep your comment relevant. :) – ibid Mar 8 '16 at 21:17
4

The examples of Harry doing the wandless magic with the snake and blowing up his aunt are actually good ways to explain why wizards, specifically young ones at Hogwarts, use their wands. The wandless magic Harry uses is sloppy, unpredictable, and mostly unintentional. Harry can't do wandless magic "on command". Only powerful and fully trained wizards, Dumbledore for example, can do wandless magic. The wizards use the wands and the spell words to direct their magical energy into an intentional and predictable action. If you'd like, the wands are like training wheels. Plus, wandless magic probably requires a lot of energy and tires the wizard faster than if he/she had help channeling their magical energy.

(Related to the question: Harry only does wandless magic when he is angry with someone, much like how Tom Riddle made "bad things happen" to people who were mean to him. This is an ability which, like parseltongue, was 'given' to Harry with Voldemort's soul, so he wouldn't necessarily be able to perform it if he were not the Chosen One.)

For more information, check out the Harry Potter Wiki page on wandless spells, which backs up the points I made.

  • Thanks for that link, it answers a lot of my questions. Especially Andros the Invincible who "at some point, [...] mastered wandless spellcasting". – Captain Man Oct 12 '15 at 17:03
  • Worth mentioning that one of the few wizards we actually see performing wandless magic in the HP movies is the Wizard in the Leaky Cauldron, which has lead to some interesting fan fiction (totally SFW). – Gaurav Oct 15 '15 at 7:27
  • @CaptainMan - No available canon about Andros save the size of his Patronus. HP wiki was (probably) basing the wandless part on (non-canon) video game artwork. – ibid Apr 10 '16 at 15:43
  • I think all answers above are well written and mostly correct, but all of them missed the fact that Harry had done intentional wandless magic at the fifth book during the time when dementors attacked Harry and Dudley, he yelled lumos after losing his wand in order to find it.(he found it lying few centimeters away if I am not mistaken) I checked pottermore regarding how incantation words work with wandless magic but couldn't find a topic, I think it is not necessary to do so but I am just speculating. – Emre Cem Eleviş Jan 5 '17 at 1:41
3

They don't need the wand to perform magic, as you say and as evidenced throughout the books. However, the wand is an instrument that's used to channel magic - I'm pretty sure this is explained somewhere in the books but I don't recall exactly where to try to grab a quote - so while it's possible to intentionally cast (at least some) spells without a wand, it's much easier to do so using a wand. That's particularly important for young wizards who are still learning how to control their magic.

There are some spells that seem to absolutely require a wand. Lumos appears to function by focusing magic through the wand's core to produce light, and some spells mentioned in the books (such as the Levitation charm Leviosa) seem to require a very specific wand movement to work correctly.

  • When i said need, what I meant to say was that most of them do, since wandless magic, though certainly possible, appears to be the exception, and not the rule. A wand is not necessary for magic, but for most wizards it is necessary for accurate magic. – Lord Voldemort Oct 12 '15 at 17:12
-1

Just to add to the above answers, the core feature of a wand is the Magical element from a magical being that is within it i.e. a Phoenix feather or a Dragon heartstring. As answered above the wand simply channelizes the Magical energy of the Wizard/Witch to focus it to do conscious and powerful spells. Even is seen to be doing wandless magic when trying to save Harry when he is on the bewitched broom during a Quidditch match.

-1

think of it like an AM/FM, the signals (radio or magical) are there, but without the right equipment (receiver/wizard or witch) they are not realized and without the antenna (wand) they can't be used effectively.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.