This evening I was watching Coppelia, a ballet where a toymaker tries to bring a doll he made to life. Coppelia premiered in 1870 and the story of Pinocchio was written in 1870. This shows up even earlier, in 1823, in Frankenstein, where Victor Frankenstein creates a corpse and brings it to live, and recently in Star Trek (where, in Requiem for Methuselah, Flint creates Rayna and attempts to make her "real" by giving her emotions), and in Star Trek: The Next Generation, where Data is even called Pinocchio, both on screen and in the series bible.

Where did this trope start? Is there evidence of stories of making a creation that seems almost like a lifelike human and trying to bring it to life from even before Frankenstein?

  • 1
    The story doesn't quite fit the specifications (mostly due to the lack of intentionally), but I would be remiss if I didn't mention Búri, who was licked into shape by a primordial super-cow (yes, really) Nov 8 '18 at 7:01

Pygmalion (so, at the latest, the trope is dated 8AD, in Ovid's Metamorphoses).

The story itself predates Ovid and comes from Ancient Greeks.

Statue's name was Galatea (not named by Ovid but given in Apollodorus's Bibliotheca, which predates Ovid).

If you go into religions, you of course also have Hebrew god giving life to Adam, and assorted Greek gods doing the a similar (but "god-created" instead of "human-created" trope (Hephaestus and Zeus both)

  • Ohhh! Good one. I was sure a trope like this would go WAY far back! And I had forgotten that when I was looking. So you don't have a reference of anything written on stone tablets that pre-dates this, do you?
    – Tango
    Feb 11 '12 at 6:01
  • I doubt that Adam counts. He was in no way a doll or statue made alive by a human. Pinocchio and Galatea are both created in a human society, the point is that they become "alive" in a sense resembling (already existing) humans.
    – vsz
    Feb 11 '12 at 13:10
  • 2
    @TangoOversway The golem traditions date even further back, but golems created by humans usually have no will. DVK: the Hebrew god wasn't the first to create humans, but that's a different idea from humans creating another sentient being.
    – user56
    Feb 11 '12 at 15:47
  • @Gilles - I edited the answer to clarify the distinction. Feb 11 '12 at 17:22

Strictly dealing with fiction in the context of humans bringing their creations to life, don't forget the Golem.

Christoph Arlond in 1674 and an unnamed Polish author perhaps in 1630-1640 tell the story of Rabbi Eliyahu of Chelm and the creation of his Golem. A couple centuries later, when Shelley's Frankenstein began popularizing the theme, German authors began retelling a variation of this story involving Judah Loew ben Bezalel, the Rabbi of Prague.

(The golem stories tell of a rabbi who seeks to copy what the Hebrew God did with Adam, and fashions a creature of clay that he imbues with life. In the stories, the rabbis bring the clay sculptures to life by inscribing a scroll with the word "truth" upon it and putting the scroll on or in the golem.)


Even though we've decided not to include religious texts, I think this is the earliest mention (as DVK said). Here is the text (from Genesis 1:26-27):

Then God said, “Let us make man in our image, in our likeness, and let them rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air, over the livestock, over all the earth, and over all the creatures that move along the ground.”

So God created man in his own image,

in the image of God he created him;

 male and female he created them.

  • Now, the REALLY good question (here? Lit.SE? History.SE?) is whether original Greek mythos or the story of Adam was first? Feb 11 '12 at 13:07
  • 2
    The Genesis example technically fulfills the OP's question about "Bringing Your Creation To Life Start". He could tell us whether examples in which it is a god doing the creation answer his question.
    – DaG
    Feb 11 '12 at 13:23
  • 2
    "Even though we decided no to do this, I'm doing this"
    – vsz
    Feb 11 '12 at 13:25
  • 3
    @DVK The question states almost like a lifelike human, which precludes actual humans.
    – user1027
    Feb 11 '12 at 17:29
  • 1
    While this is not what I felt was the best answer, because, to my limited knowledge and expansive ignorance, I think the Greek myth predates it, I think this is dead on target and really deserves more upvotes. If one does not believe in religion, then imagining a god acting like Gepetto would be the start of this archetype, and if one does believe in religion, then it shows that being created in the image of one's god also means the same urge to create that one's god as. Thank you for thinking outside the box!
    – Tango
    Feb 14 '12 at 0:03

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.