I am wondering what size the view screen on the bridge of the USS Enterprise (NCC-1701-D) is. I want to know how it compares with current consumer display technology.

I am thinking if the information is not in any of the technical manuals then it may be determined by comparing it to the height of people standing near it in episodes.

Note that displays are generally measured across the diagonal between opposing corners.

Bonus question: What is the aspect ratio?

  • 1
    Gizmodo article from 2009 addressing the same question.
    – Ben Miller
    Dec 4, 2015 at 19:01
  • "I want to know how it compares with current consumer display technology." I believe the former Star Trek Experience in Las Vegas used video projection in what appeared to be a full-scale replica of the bridge. So, yes, it's feasible with consumer current display tech. In fact, consumer tech is even better today, with 4K projectors. Then again, the Enterprise display had to look good for aliens and enhanced humans whose color vision might not be fooled by the tri-stimulus tech designed for traditional human eyeballs. Dec 5, 2015 at 0:33

4 Answers 4


Canon answer = 4.8 m x 2.5 m

enter image description here

According to the Star Trek: The Next Generation Technical Manual, written by TNG production designers Michael Okuda and Rick Sternbach,

At the very front of the bridge chamber is located a large (4.8 x 2.5 meter) visual display panel.

(Section 3.1, "Main Bridge", p.30)

Given the canonicity of this information, we should interpret this as the exact dimensions.

Bonus: Aspect ratio of 48:25.

  • 2
    Within .75 feet of my visual estimate on both bounds :D
    – Mwr247
    Dec 4, 2015 at 20:11
  • 1
    @Mwr247 : Which makes your estimate better than the estimate from the TNG companion that Richard uses. :-)
    – Praxis
    Dec 4, 2015 at 20:12
  • 1
    Good find. You have my +1. That being said, is there any proof that these dimensions were actually translated into real life?
    – Valorum
    Dec 4, 2015 at 20:21
  • 1
    Well, it really depends what you use for the height of a non-rectangular object. Dec 4, 2015 at 20:39
  • 2
    @Praxis Sounds like the documentation for every software piece I've ever written... make it, then document what comes out :)
    – corsiKa
    Dec 4, 2015 at 21:32

The Star Trek: The Next Generation: Companion indicates that the viewscreen is approximately 9 feet high. That would make the width 19 feet and the diagonal measurement pretty much exactly 20 feet (240 inches).

The result was an Enterprise bridge set that, thanks to its nine-foot-tall viewscreen and sprawling overhead window, seems immense. In reality, however, it's only thirty-eight feet wide, the same width as the original, but it is two feet longer and has a fourteen-foot ceiling. The side ramps and various levels add to the illusion of height.

enter image description here

Bonus answer; 19:9 aspect ratio.

  • 4
    Nice work. For the record, the actual measurements are in my answer. :-)
    – Praxis
    Dec 4, 2015 at 20:10

Using the image in Doug B's answer, we can attempt to determine the size by using the door as the scale, given that they are both nearly the same distance from the camera (the door being a little closer).

Based on other clips, the doors appear to be roughly 6'8" in height. Jonathan Frakes is 6'4", and the top of the door appears to be a few inches higher than his head. If we account for shoe height, and that the average American door is 6'8", this seems like a reasonable assumption.

The screen is taller than the door in the background (and roughly the same distance back back at the center of each). Measuring the height of each at the center in pixels, the screen appears to be very close to 8 feet in height. Likewise, on it's side and scaled for the angle, it appears to be roughly 2.5 door-heights wide (around 16'6").

While not definitive, I would put it at 8 x 16.5 feet (which would be a 16:33 aspect ratio).

EDIT: Praxis gives a definitive answer, which is within about .75 feet of this estimate (8'2.5" tall, 15'9" wide).


My guess is that it is about 12 feet by 7 feet based on the picture below. Eyeballing it, and assuming Riker is about 6' tall, it looks like the screen is maybe a foot taller than him if he was to stand next to it and not counting the control panel. It also looks to be about the same ratio of dimensions as a standard movie theatre screen (16:9).

enter image description here

  • Excellent choice of screenshot. In modern terminology that would make it a 166.7 inch TV. Makes my 55 inch look pretty shabby.
    – HighInBC
    Dec 4, 2015 at 19:04
  • 1
    I've gotta believe someone can find an answer based on more accuracy than 'eyeballing it'. Dec 4, 2015 at 19:15
  • 2
    @ThePopMachine : Done. :-)
    – Praxis
    Dec 4, 2015 at 20:03

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.