Tom Bombadil says this to the hobbits, in reply to the question "who are you?":

(...) But you are young and I am old. Eldest, that’s what I am. Mark my words, my friends: Tom was here before the river and the trees; Tom remembers the first raindrop and the first acorn. He made paths before the Big People, and saw the little People arriving. He was here before the Kings and the graves and the Barrow-wights. When the Elves passed westward, Tom was here already, before the seas were bent. He knew the dark under the stars when it was fearless – before the Dark Lord came from Outside.

So basically, he was here before everything else. After Helm's Deep, when a party rides to Isengard, Gandalf says this to Théoden:

Well, Théoden, will you ride with me to find Treebeard? We must go round about, but it is not far. When you see Treebeard, you will learn much. For Treebeard is Fangorn, and the eldest and chief of the Ents, and when you speak with him you will hear the speech of the oldest of all living things.

Maybe this is just an inconsistency not intended by Tolkien, I don't know. A few years ago, I read somewhere that Tom Bombadil is not "a living creature" in a traditional sense, but there wasn't a strong argument supporting that. What is your take?

  • 3
    You might want to take a look at Who or what was Tom Bombadil? Feb 14, 2012 at 2:49
  • @BrendanLong: I did! Though it does not address the topic of my question, it does sort-of justify Bombadil not being "a living creature" in the same way as Hobbits or Men. Thanks!
    – Janoma
    Feb 14, 2012 at 12:34
  • 3
    "the oldest living thing that still walks beneath the Sun" notwithstanding, "the speech of the oldest of all living things" needn't mean that the speaker is the oldest of all living things. A good classical scholar can let you hear the "speech of a 2000 year old empire", but the doesn't mean that the scholar is 2000 years old. Feb 20, 2014 at 17:15
  • 1
    Possible duplicate of Who or what is the oldest sentient being in Tolkien's lore?
    – Skooba
    Jan 11, 2018 at 21:38
  • 3
    Definitely not a dup since the accepted answer is neither Treebeard not Bombadil. Pay attention man.
    – amflare
    Jan 11, 2018 at 22:10

5 Answers 5


Yavanna had created the trees and Melkor was destroying them. So to help Yavanna, Ilúvatar sent spirits with which to ensoul certain trees to serve as protectors of the others: these creatures were the Ents. Treebeard was the oldest of the Ents, and so the firstborn of all sentient or perhaps animate things on Arda, or as Gandalf loosely says, 'living creatures'. Trees and other plants did come before Ents. This is all in the Silmarillion.

That takes care of Treebeard. What of Tom Bombadil?

In the entire canon of LOTR/Silmarillion (and to my knowledge all Tolkien's writings but then I haven't read them all now, have I?) there is no in-universe explanation* of who or what Bombadil is. A Maia? A Vala? Eru himself? Some other kind of being? All sorts of theories have been proposed. But in the stories? As Goldberry says, "He is".

So if Bombadil told the truth when he said he was older than the seeds of the trees, then he was older than Treebeard. But he may have lied. Or was mistaken. Or Gandalf lied. Or was mistaken. Or Bombadil may not have been of Arda but of the Heavens. The stories don't say.

*Out-of-universe, Tolkien had already invented the character of Tom Bombadil prior to LOTR and included him as "an 'allegory', or an exemplar, a particular embodying of pure (real) natural science..."

  • 3
    Tolkien commented that when Bombadil speaks about himself [being the eldest], he is speaking from his (Bombadil's) own perspective and not Tolkien's; the same could be said about Treebeard: scifi.stackexchange.com/a/46928/21267
    – Möoz
    Apr 17, 2014 at 3:28
  • 2
    Shouldn't the Firstborn (Elves) have awoken before the Ents, by definition? C.f. the Dwarves.
    – OrangeDog
    Sep 13, 2016 at 14:05
  • 1
    Wasn't Yavanna's fear that the Dwarves would cut down all the trees, not that Melkor currently was?
    – OrangeDog
    Aug 4, 2020 at 11:12
  • If you want to answer a question by suggesting that a statement in the canon is false, you need to be able to essay an explanation for that assertion based on the canon -- otherwise, "I don't know" is a more succinct answer. I don't believe there is any information in the canon that suggests he erred in his claims.
    – Mark Olson
    Dec 10, 2020 at 19:58

From the Wikipedia article about Tom Bombadil:

Treebeard calls himself the eldest living being of Middle-earth and says that he was there before anyone else. However, Tolkien remarked in another context: "Treebeard is a character in my story, not me; and though he has a great memory and some earthy wisdom, he is not one of the Wise, and there is quite a lot he does not know or understand."

  • 2
    Do you have a reference (other than Wikipedia)? Is it from a letter?
    – Janoma
    Feb 14, 2012 at 12:33
  • @Janoma Follow the Wikipedia link, and you'll see the originating reference. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Bombadil#cite_note-let153-2
    – Iszi
    Feb 14, 2012 at 13:28
  • 5
    @Janoma I really don't like it when Wikipedia does that. The article quotes a book published in 1981, with no page number, that supposedly quotes J.R.R. Tolkien. But there is no explanation other than that. When, where, in what context was that supposed quote of J.R.R. Tolkien sourced? I'm not criticizing Mentoliptus or Iszi. This sort of thing happens a lot, and about less arcane matters. May 4, 2012 at 14:43
  • @FeralOink You're right, I should have researched more. But you got me thinking that this sort of "misleading" informations can be dangerous for "less arcane matters"! May 4, 2012 at 20:42
  • Yes, like SCADA. But that is a story for another day! Thank you for acknowledging my comment, I smiled. May 4, 2012 at 21:12

Treebeard as an Ent was created as part of the Music of the Ainur, and the awakening of the first Ents is precisely datable to the same time as the Elves awoke, as is told in The Silmarillion chapter "Of Aulë and Yavanna":

'Yet it was in the Song', said Yavanna. 'For while thou wert in the heavens and with Ulmo built the clouds and poured out the rains, I lifted up the branches of great trees to receive them, and some sang to Ilúvatar amid the wind and the rain.'


Behold! When the Children awake, then the thought of Yavanna will awake also, and it will summon spirits from afar, and they will go among the kelvar and the olvar, and some will dwell therein, and be held in reverence, and their just anger shall be feared.

This means that Treebeard's origin is, at the very earliest, Year of the Trees 1050, just immediately after Varda's second star-making.

If we take Tom's claims at face value:

Tom was here before the river and the trees; Tom remembers the first raindrop and the first acorn.

This dates him to at the latest the time of the Valar's dwelling on Almaren and the Years of the Lamps, because during that time (The Silmarillion, "Of the Beginning of Days"):

Then the seeds that Yavanna had sown began swiftly to sprout and to burgeon, and there arose a multitude of growing things great and small, mosses and grasses and great ferns, and trees whose tops were crowned with cloud as they were living mountains, but whose feet were wrapped in a green twilight.

Since this was before the Years of the Trees, Tom Bombadil is therefore oldest (although whether he — whatever he is — could be called "living" is another matter).

  • 4
    Also, he could just be lying.
    – Valorum
    Dec 16, 2014 at 0:10
  • 4
    As an aside: I'm not sure if it's certain that Treebeard was an original Ent, just that he was the oldest surviving one. We know that he walked in Beleriand when he was young, but that doesn't prove anything; he could still be 2nd or 3rd generation.
    – user8719
    Dec 16, 2014 at 0:31
  • 2
    @user8719 is gone, but The Two Towers clearly says Fangorn was one of the first Ents: Only three remain of the first Ents that walked in the woods before the Darkness: only myself, Fangorn, and Finglas and Fladrif...
    – Spencer
    Oct 19, 2019 at 17:52

I believe Tom Bombadil is the older of the two. I remember it saying that the elves taught the trees to speak. Now I know the trees are different from Ents, but I assume that the elves would still have some association with the making of Ents. Now if this is true, then Tom Bombadil must be the older, for he was there before the coming of elves, and therefore before the trees and ents. That is if I'm correct in saying that the Ents were made around the time the elves taught the trees to speak. This is a total guess on my part.


It's worth considering who is stating that Treebeard is oldest. It's Gandalf while he's only been on middle earth for 1000 years he's existed since before time yet he says Treebeard is

the oldest living thing that still walks beneath the Sun upon this Middle-earth.

Note that's this is quite a conditional statement.

  • Living thing
  • Walks
  • Beneath the sun.

Now these conditions can take out things like static trees and tunnel beasts below Moria. But as far as we know Tom is living and walking in the sun. So it would seem we still have a contradiction.

But I think there is a difference. Tom was first. But Trerbeard is older because like Gandalf, Tom is ageless. What Tom is, is unknown but to have experienced "the first raindrop" would put him outside the realm of normal beings. He looks like a man, yet men only appeared after ents and elves so the form he is seen in is just a manifestation of Tom. He may have existed a long time but he had not gotten older

Where as Treebeard has always been Treebeard, slowly getting older year by year. He may age slowly but he does age.

It is also worth noting that Tolkien was a linguist Tom calls himself Eldest not oldest. Eldest seems to be properly used among kin. Oldest among more general objects.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.