2

This question already has an answer here:

In the original Star Wars movie, Grand Moff Tarkin destroys a perfectly viable Alderaan seemingly simply to demonstrate imperial ruthlessness. It then stands to reason that the economic loss was negligible to the Imperium, implying immense wealth.
Note there are some that claim that the empire was on the brink of collapse. Presumably, in that case, Emperor Palpatine simply would not have cared. But this is not the sense we get in the first movie. If anything the upper echelons of the empire exuded nothing but confidence!
(Looking at this excellent question we get a possible sense of the way the Empire funded itself.)

Then, can we reasonably estimate the number of worlds in the Empire?


If we can prove a general statement such as 'it comprised the whole far-far-away galaxy' that would be sufficient proof. Also if it leads to speculation we'll remove it

marked as duplicate by Rand al'Thor, DVK-on-Ahch-To star-wars Dec 12 '15 at 2:22

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • Yep, this would explain why the loss of a few worlds meant nothing to them. 50 million!! – Athena Widget Dec 12 '15 at 2:29
  • I commented on this recently: scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/109159/… In short: even for lower estimates of Empire size, the (relative) loss was absurdly tiny compared to conflicts that barely get our attention today. – Luaan Apr 21 '16 at 11:55