Anyone familiar with Legends - especially games - will know how consistently weak these crafts are. Take the Rogue Squadron series of games for example: TIE Fighters are easily one-shotted while Interceptors can take slightly more damage, while A-Wings are also very vulnerable to damage. This is because of the Empire's quantity-over-quality philosophy, and the lack of shields on rank-and-file TIEs. As for the A-Wing, it was designed to focus heavily on speed and agility at the expense of shield strength.

How have things changed bringing these crafts into Disney canon?

closed as too broad by Valorum, Null Oct 2 '16 at 20:53

Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • TIE fighters were always pushovers. Just watch the trench run again. One hit KOs. – Slacklord the Terrible Feb 5 '16 at 17:30
  • The A-Wing though – thegreatjedi Feb 5 '16 at 17:31
  • That's where I'm at a loss. They don't seem to blow up any easier than x-wings, but in both cases the primary enemies are TIE fighters and turbolasers. I don't think it's possible to compare their durability. – Slacklord the Terrible Feb 5 '16 at 17:40
  • There might be technical information and descriptions though. We'll see – thegreatjedi Feb 6 '16 at 3:06
  • 1
    There are two different (and distinct) questions here "How strong are TIE Fighters in Disney canon?" and "How strong are A-Wings in Disney canon?" – Valorum Oct 2 '16 at 20:25

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.