11

(I’m currently travelling with no access to the books, so bear with my paraphrasing from memory.)

During Deathly Hallows, we see through Kreacher’s retelling how –

  • Voldemort told his Death Eaters he needed a house-elf to assist him in a task
  • Regulus volunteered Kreacher for the task and told him to come back after the task was finished
  • Voldemort took Kreacher to the cave by the sea, made him drink that rather unsavoury potion that Regulus and Dumbledore later both drank, too
  • Voldemort placed the locket in the stone basin when the potion was all drunk
  • Voldemort left Kreacher to be killed by the Inferi (not realising that his anti-Apparition spells did not affect elf magic)

So far so good. Kreacher escaped and told Regulus the whole ordeal; Regulus had a change of heart, managed to get to the cave with Kreacher, got the real locket out and exchanged it for a fake one, then died at the hands of the Inferi (perhaps unnecessarily), Kreacher once again coming back, this time with the real locket.

 

Now, the cave itself seems to be a natural cave: it was there when Riddle went there as a child). But most of the ‘extra features’ in it were presumably created by Voldemort himself later on, quite likely with the specific purpose of hiding a Horcrux there. At least the stone basin and the potion within it doesn’t seem to have had any other purpose than the locket.

We know that Voldemort is able to get to the basin and examine its contents quite easily (as seen by Harry during Deathly Hallows), which makes sense—they’re all his own spells, after all, so he would have built in ‘back doors’ for himself. But that must mean that he was able to somehow drain the potion from the basin without drinking it, or summoning the locket from within the potion—something that no one but he could do.

 

So the real question:

If Voldemort made the basin and potion himself with the purpose of hiding a Horcrux in it, why did he need a house-elf to drink the potion in order to hide the locket there? Why not just put the locket in the basin before filling it with the potion? Or indeed just use one of his ‘back doors’ to put the locket in the potion the same way he later checked whether it was still there.

That way, there would have been no witnesses at all, and no way for anyone to know where the locket was. Why bring an unnecessary witness? Just to do a test run and see if his potion worked? Doesn’t seem like how Voldy’s mind works—he’s the greatest wizard ever, of course his magic will work. In fact, given that he could come back and test it himself with no problems, why have the potion work like that at all, enabling just about anyone with enough will-power (and a helper) to retrieve the locket?

  • 2
    i think the reason their is no back door, is because he fears dumbledore, and knows that if their is a way around the potion, and dumbledore somehow finds this cave, that dumbledore could figure it out. it may not even be a known fear, just passive enough that in the back of his mind he worrys someone is smarter then him. – Himarm Feb 7 '16 at 18:32
  • @Himarm But then how does he check for the locket himself? We actually see him (through Harry) going to the cave and finding out that the locket is gone—how does he do that if he hasn’t made some kind of ‘back door’ for himself? – Janus Bahs Jacquet Feb 7 '16 at 18:36
  • 1
    i could have sworn they could see the locket under the liquid, but after re-reading they cant boo haha – Himarm Feb 7 '16 at 19:18
  • 2
    Kreacher was his back door. And failing that, he could always have acquired another house elf to perform the task for him. – Darrel Hoffman Feb 7 '16 at 20:48
  • 1
    @Darrel You’re missing the point, it seems. On the night of the Hogwarts Battle, he successfully entered the cave and examined the basin, verifying that the locket was not there. He did this on his own. In other words, he used his ‘back door’ on that night. So the back door was obviously not set up so that he needed anyone else there (that would have been most unlike him, too), but so that he would be able to do it alone, as indeed he did. – Janus Bahs Jacquet Feb 7 '16 at 21:03
14

To take it in order:

  • Why not just put the locket in the basin before filling it with the potion?

It seems likely that the presence of such strong magic as a Horcrux would have interfered with the spells used to create the basin.

But even if that isn't true, Voldemort would undoubtedly (as Harry speculated) have wanted a test run of the cave's defenses and the way through them before trusting the locket to them. After all, what if it hadn't worked as planned, and Kreacher had proved unable to empty the basin? That would likely mean that the defenses were flawed, and if the locket was already behind them, Voldemort would have to expend considerable effort (and perhaps risk) to tear them down again to get it out.

Conversely, of course, if they were never tested then Voldemort could not be certain they were as strong as he had intended. And as far as Voldemort was concerned, Kreacher was entirely expendable; his death was a trivial price to pay to ensure the safety of part of Voldemort's soul.

  • Or indeed just use one of his ‘back doors’ to put the locket in the potion the same way he later checked whether it was still there.

There were no back-doors, or rather, the use of a house-elf was the back door; the plan, in my opinion, was that if he ever needed to remove the locket he'd "borrow" another house-elf. That was, no doubt, a protection against Dumbledore, who would surely have been able to discover any other weaknesses the spell might have been given but would have been too ethical to think of sacrificing another living being in such a way.

Of course, there was a flaw in the plan, but Voldemort couldn't have imagined that Dumbledore would be willing to sacrifice himself.

  • We know that Voldemort is able to get to the basin and examine its contents quite easily

Examine the contents, but not remove the contents. From Chapter 29 of Deathly Hallows:

As she said it, a wrath that was like physical pain blazed through Harry, setting his scar on fire, and for a second he looked down upon a basin whose potion had turned clear, [...]

(emphasis mine).

It is clear (no pun intended) from this that the potion was still there, and hence still protecting any contents the basin might have had - we can therefore conclude, as suggested in the comments, that this isn't a back door so much as a form of tamper-evident seal.

Additional: this quote also shows that the potion is indeed, as I had assumed, an implicit part of the basin's enchantment rather than a separate spell, since at some point between when it was emptied in Half-Blood Prince and this scene in Deathly Hallows it has refilled itself without Voldemort's intervention. (Kreacher's description of his encounter with the basin suggested otherwise, but under the circumstances he may not have completely understood what was happening.) [And as pointed out in the comments, it must also have refilled itself after Regulus emptied it, or else Harry and Dumbledore would have found it empty.]

That may mean that the basin and potion had to be created together, and that the only way to store something in the basin was to have someone drink the potion first - but of course in the absence of a qualified wizard, this is still just speculation. :-)

As for why the potion wasn't lethal, Dumbledore explains this in Half-Blood Prince, chapter 26:

'I'm sorry, Harry; I should have said, he would not want immediately to kill the person who reached this island,' Dumbledore corrected himself. 'He would want to keep them alive long enough to find out how they managed to penetrate so far through his defences and, most importantly of all, why they were so intent upon emptying the basin. Do not forget that Lord Voldemort believes that he alone knows about his Horcruxes.'

(It isn't clear to me how this fits in with the presence of the Inferi, but perhaps they were attempting to capture rather than kill, all appearances to the contrary.)

  • 2
    Aaaahh! The potion turned clear when there was nothing in the basin. I had not remembered that detail from the book (this is what I get for not bringing all seven books when I travel!). This explains a great deal. It doesn’t explain why he wouldn’t make it a lethal potion (just house-elves after all, nothing to be concerned about)—that would have been the safer option, witness-wise—but it does pretty much explain everything else. I suppose a test run is the best reason there is for Kreacher being there at all… – Janus Bahs Jacquet Feb 7 '16 at 22:36
  • 2
    My interpretation was that the potion wasn't always clear when the basin was otherwise empty, but could be turned clear with the appropriate spell. But the text is compatible with either interpretation. The other interesting aspect of that quote is that it means that the basin refilled itself after Dumbledore drank it; I'll have to add that to my answer. – Harry Johnston Feb 7 '16 at 22:44
  • It would kind of have to have done that, otherwise Regulus/Kreacher would have had no potion to put the fake locket in and there would be no potion in it when Dumbledore and Harry showed up, either. – Janus Bahs Jacquet Feb 7 '16 at 22:46
  • 2
    @JanusBahsJacquet Harry wonders why the potion isn't lethal too. Dumbledore explains that Voldemort "...would want to keep them alive long enough to find out how they managed to penetrate so far through his defenses and, most importantly of all, why they were so intent upon emptying the basin. Do not forget that Lord Voldemort believes that he alone knows about his Horcruxes." – DavidS Feb 8 '16 at 10:07
6

Harry seems to think (and we're given no reason to doubt him) that it was indeed a test run of the cave's defenses.

Of course there had been a boat; Harry knew the boat, ghostly green and tiny, bewitched so as to carry one wizard and one victim toward the island in the center. This, then, was how Voldemort had tested the defenses surrounding the Horcrux, by borrowing a disposable creature, a house-elf…

In particular, I think Voldemort was confident that the locket was protected, but he needed to test whether he'd be able to retrieve the locket later. After proving that his hidden boat would carry him and an elf and that the potion wouldn't kill the elf before he drank it all, he felt comfortable leaving the locket.

  • 1
    I suppose that could be it… it just still seems odd and backwards. Seemingly, he is able to go alone and verify if the locket is still there, so he would almost have to also be able to take out the locket if it were still there; so why have the madness potion there at all? Why have something that anyone can drink and get rid of, as long as they have someone to help them, rather than something completely impenetrable or something that would actually kill you with just one mouthful? (As for the boat—didn’t he fly through the cave in Harry’s vision? Or did he just fly to it?) – Janus Bahs Jacquet Feb 7 '16 at 16:00
1

Your key point here is that

they’re all his own spells, after all, so he would have built in ‘back doors’ for himself

First of all, Voldemort might just be cruel enough to make Kreacher drink the potion even if he could have simply Summoned the locket, just to torture him, but I don't think this was his reason. I can think of a few other reasons:

  • He could have just wanted to see if the potion worked. He is the greatest wizard ever, maybe, but it still benefits him to be careful, to make sure that the potion is working well enough to guard the locket and make the people who drank it crazy/in pain.

  • He could have needed something to be bait for the Inferi--maybe they get agitated every time someone comes to the cave, and he needed Kreacher to use to be Inferiated so that Voldemort could leave safely.

  • Maybe he didn't build 'back doors' at all. It's very likely that if he had, someone else--Dumbledore, for instance, who later had to drink the same potion--could have figured out how to get around drinking the potion, which would have basically gone against the whole point of him being there. Or he just never thought he'd need to use them, since he knew that if he needed to get past the potion, he would have plenty of followers and their house-elves to force to drink the potion.
  • The problem is that during Deathly Hallows we know that he went, alone and unaided, into the cave, crossed to the island, and looked in the basin to discover that the locket was not there. There was no one to act as Inferius bait, and there was no one to drink the potion for him. If he didn’t have some sort of ‘back door’ that allowed him to get in, how did he do just that? (The Inferi only get agitated once you touch the water, not just when you enter the cave.) – Janus Bahs Jacquet Feb 7 '16 at 15:26
  • @janusbahsjacquet I think the only backdoor he'd need is to move the locket, it sounds like from him using Kreacher it didn't have one. – AncientSwordRage Feb 7 '16 at 15:37
  • Doesn't address why he didn't put the locket in before the potion. – ibid Feb 7 '16 at 15:47

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.