5

All across Doctor Who series, we are told about "fixed points in time". That seems to be fully admitted by whole Who community.

I was watching Water of Mars, and something struck me: the Doctor said that fixed points are nothing but his own theory.

Is this real? I mean, if it's nothing but his theory, why do "time cleaners" exist, as we see in Father's Day?

enter image description here

  • 3
    Dr Who does not operate on a consistent time travel theory (other than "timey-wimey stuff"). Some episodes work on self-consistency principle model (like Tardis within Tardis special, or more recently explained in breaking the 4th wall moment with 12th doctor and Beethovens 5th symphony), other episodes (like the two you mention) choose Back to the Future style history overriding. I doubt there is a satisfactory answer somewhere here... – Deltharis Feb 15 '16 at 12:51
  • The "fixed points in time" and the "time cleaners" are just plot devices to prevent that every bad done to the doctor or his companions or anybody else we love is simply shrugged of and "corrected" by time traveling back and change it. But it's not consistent. There are several examples where the whole timeline is changed without any fixed points in time preventing that, for example when the great intelligence manipulated the doctors timeline and thousands of worlds vanished because he was not there to save them. – Hothie Feb 15 '16 at 12:55
7

The Doctor attempted to convince himself that fixed points were just a theory and that he could change them, however, The Waters of Mars proved the opposite - that he is still limited at fixed points, and further that his megalomania, when not tempered by a companion, would lead to more tragedy rather than less. The lesson of Mars was not that he could change fixed points; it was that fixed points would survive his attempts to change them.

This is consistent across the two episodes you mention:

In the case of Father's Day, the time cleaners came because the pivotal point - Rose's father - needed to be cleaned up.

In the case of The Waters of Mars, the time cleaners do not need to come, because the pivotal point - Adelaide Brook - cleaned herself up. Her living was the pivotal point; in committing suicide, she resolved the two timelines. Her tragic death following the destruction of Bowie Base One remains to inspire her granddaughter - all that changed was the location of that death.

Had she not committed suicide, it's reasonable to assume the time cleaners would have shown up eventually. They didn't appear right away for Rose's father, either.

Addendum:

A bit more about the Doctor's mental state in Waters of Mars...

To quote the Tardis Wikia:

Mostly a character piece, it showed the extremes to which the Doctor would go when unregulated by either other Time Lords or companions.

The Transcript shows the point at which the Doctor contradicts his earlier statements about the fixed point being immutable. This is the speech I was referring to when I used the term "megalomania" earlier:

ADELAIDE:
But you said we die! For the future, for the human race.

DOCTOR:
Yes, because there are laws. There are Laws of Time. Once upon
a time there were people in charge of those laws, but they died.
They all died. Do you know who that leaves? Me! It's taken me 
all these years to realise the Laws of Time are mine and they
will obey me!

and the Wikia again describing the climax of the episode:

The Doctor argues that the rules of the Time Lords were only valid while their civilisation existed, and that since he is the last of his race he has total authority over time. He states that he no longer considers himself to have survived the Time War, but to have won it and proudly declares himself the "Time Lord Victorious" and remarks that with this power he will now be able to save influential figures such as Adelaide as well as "little people": the likes of Yuri and Mia. Horrified by the Doctor's newfound arrogance, Adelaide says: "Who decides how important they are!? I don't care who you are, the Time Lord Victorious is wrong!".

The transcript again:

[Adelaide commits suicide.  The Doctor remembers her saying:]
*ADELAIDE:
I don't care who you are. A Time Lord Victorious is wrong.

The DOCTOR turns and looks in the opposite direction.

DOCTOR:
I've gone too far.

And recall that this is all happening after the Doctor had been warned that his death was approaching. The next few lines of the transcript:

[OOD-SIGMA is standing in the road. The DOCTOR falls to his knees.]

DOCTOR:
(to OOD-SIGMA) Is this it? My death? Is it time?

[OOD-SIGMA vanishes. The DOCTOR stands and enters the TARDIS, 
slamming the door shut.]

The Doctor was pretty mentally unhinged at this point. Unregulated by a companion, running from his foretold death, his arrogance reached new levels and was sharply reined in when the fixed point re-asserted itself with Adelaide's death.

So - to wrap this back to the question - the doctor didn't say it was his theory, he said it was a theory:

DOCTOR:
This moment, this precise moment in time, it's like... I mean,
it's only a theory. What do I know? But I think certain moments
in time are fixed. 

It's one of the theories that the Time Lords ruled in accordance with. And the Time Cleaners are phenomena that act in a way that supports that theory - probably not the only support, but one of them. In Mars, the Doctor convinced himself that he could rewrite rules; he was wrong, and Adelaide proved it before the Time Cleaners were needed to reconcile time.

  • Short version : The Doctor is trying to convince himself that he can change fixed points, 'cause he's alone. Am I right? – Saphirel Feb 15 '16 at 16:27
  • @Saphirel, there's definitely a connection between his personality shift during that episode and his stated belief in this episode that he's able to overcome fixed points. I'll update the answer with some quotes. – gowenfawr Feb 15 '16 at 16:30
  • So why didn't the time cleaners appear in "The Wedding of River Song"? – Kevin Feb 15 '16 at 17:10
  • 4
    @Kevin, I think the Time Cleaners looked at the size of that mess and said "Screw it! I've got a headache, someone else can take this one!" – gowenfawr Feb 15 '16 at 17:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.