1

This question already has an answer here:

In the Star Trek reboot movie, Nero's ship the Narada was a mining ship. However, it was very heavily armed with devastating weaponry that far outmatched any ships from the earlier time. While the Romulans are a warlike race and a mining ship may need to defend itself against pirates or the like, the sheer level of offensive weaponry on the Narada seems very out of place on a civilian vessel*. The fact that the ship has decades newer technology doesn't really explain just how well armed it is.

If I understand the timeline, the Narada encountered Spock's Vulcan ship just as it had failed to prevent the destruction of Romulus, which would have given no opportunity to arm itself beyond what it was already provisioned with.

So my question is, What canon reason would there be for the Narada to be carrying such extensive weaponry when it is a mining ship?

* In my head I pronounced this as "wessel" in honour of Chekov :)

marked as duplicate by Politank-Z, Chenmunka, Valorum star-trek Mar 21 '16 at 11:36

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • @Politank-Z Darn, I went looking for duplicates prior to posting, but I specifically used the ship name, not "mining vessel" :( – Jane S Mar 21 '16 at 9:56
  • 1
    @JaneS don't worry; I didn't realise this question had already been answered either! – Often Right Mar 21 '16 at 10:10
  • The USSR had the worlds largest trawler fleet that never fished, so to me it stands to reason that the Romulans have a similar fleet of "civilian" vessels which never carry out their civilian jobs. Having a massive armed merchant navy fleet that no one suspects can come in handy... The Narada, in my mind, just happened to be one of those ships. – Moo Mar 21 '16 at 12:56
3

This is explained in Star Trek Countdown:

In the Star Trek prequel comic book miniseries Star Trek: Countdown, the Narada's advanced weaponry and appearance are explained as being the result of the ship being retrofitted with salvaged and reverse-engineered Borg technology.

And as for why this was the case:

The Tal Shiar in the 24th century had been experimenting with Borg technology, and Nero's ship was the experimental vessel used.

(Source)

The other aspect, of course, is that this ship comes from the late 24th century (which was crippling for 24th century Federation vessels, let alone the relatively weaker 23rd century's vessels). When you combine Borg technology, which is highly advanced for its own time period, with it also being from the future, you have a powerful mix.

  • Ok, that makes sense. But it still seems odd that it was carrying so much ammunition; it seemed to have an endless supply of missiles. That still doesn't really explain why it was still so heavily armed at the point when it intercepted Spock's ship. – Jane S Mar 21 '16 at 9:51
  • @JaneS two words will explain that: JJ and plot-convenience 😉 – Often Right Mar 21 '16 at 9:53
  • LOL! I know, but I was hoping there'd be a nice canon reason for it :) – Jane S Mar 21 '16 at 9:54
  • 1
    @JaneS I suppose it had been recently refitted and was still being tested(possibly extended testing to see how it went) when the Romulus disaster occurred – Often Right Mar 21 '16 at 10:08
  • 3
    @JaneS : Unfortunately, anything and everything is possible in the Abramsverse. Why would Nero have pools of water with creatures similar to those on Ceti Alpha V on his ship? Why is Khan designing starships in Into Darkness? Sure, he's intelligent, but there's a difference between being a cunning strategist and a starship designer. Why would Khan hide his comrades in torpedoes? Can you beam yourself from Earth all the way to Qo'noS because of a few equations? Those equations existed in the Prime timeline but never got anyone that far. I just ignore the reboot completely.... – Praxis Mar 22 '16 at 1:07

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.