18

I started wondering this after the extremely gratuitous slo-mo pearls in Batman vs Superman, but forgot to google it after leaving the theater. Then I mentioned it in chat tonight when I saw the same thing happen in Batman (1989), and Wad found several more examples, so it's probably worth asking:

Does Martha Wayne always wear a pearl necklace when she gets killed, and does that necklace always fall apart so that we see individual pearls falling to the ground? Obviously, any version of Batman's parents is acceptable, no matter how obscure.

  • 2
    Gotham = Yes, Brave and the Bold = No, original comic-book = No, The Dark Knight Returns = yes, Batman (1989) = Yes, Batman: Year One (2011) = Yes, Batman: Arkham Origins = Yes, Batman Begins (2005) = Yes – Valorum May 27 '16 at 23:45
  • 1
    For what it's worth, I was looking for examples, not counter-examples. I found the original comic book version but saw that it didn't include a broken necklace. – Wad Cheber May 28 '16 at 22:26
  • 1
    @WadCheber corrected – Ixrec May 28 '16 at 22:27
18

No. There are multiple versions of the death scene where that doesn't happen.

The original comic version doesn't have that element.

Original Batman origin

Nor does Batman: The Brave and the Bold.

The Super Friends version is ambiguous, but there don't appear to be any pearls. (Watch the lower left corner)

Batman: Gotham Knight also doesn't seem to feature any pearls, but it's very short and it's hard to tell.

The Batman shows that the necklace wasn't broken in the fight.

Justice League: The Flashpoint Paradox has her wearing pearls, but they don't break. However, it's an alternate dimension, in-universe.

  • 2
    RE Flashpoint Paradox: Not to mention she doesn't even get shot in that version. One bad day for her, huh? – jpmc26 May 28 '16 at 1:37
11

In addition to the examples others have pointed out, this article from Comic Book Resources says the detail of Martha Wayne wearing a pearl necklace that broke apart when she was shot originated in Frank Miller's influential comic miniseries The Dark Knight Returns (1986), so it wouldn't have appeared in any depictions of Martha Wayne's death before that:

Another massive impact of "The Dark Knight Returns" was Miller's depiction of the death of Thomas and Martha Wayne. Martha's pearl necklace breaking and the pearls falling to the ground as she is murdered has become one of the most iconic visual images in Batman's history, and it all started in an alternate-reality story.

The comment "it all started in an alternate-reality story" refers to the fact that The Dark Knight Returns was an Elseworlds title, the publication imprint for DC stories that take place in alternate versions of the DC universe from the main continuity (The Dark Knight Returns featured an older Bruce Wayne who was 'retired' from being Batman at the beginning of the story).

Some images of Miller's depiction of the necklace getting broken (the second one is intercut with Bruce Wayne watching a news report in the 'present'):

enter image description here

enter image description here

4

No

For example, in Detective Comics #33 (1939), while Martha Wayne is wearing a necklace, it may not be pearls (hard to tell from the comic quality), and it certainly does not break apart. At least, Chill doesn't grab it, so it would rather unlikely.

enter image description here

Similarly, in Batman #47 (1948):

enter image description here

  • 1
    Warring on all criminals? Jaywalkers? People who violate the DCMA? – Molag Bal May 27 '16 at 23:54
  • @armadillo - Well, Chill didn't grab it. So it seems very unlikely. – Adamant May 27 '16 at 23:57
  • Oops, DMCA. Spelling it wrong is probably a violation of the DMCA too... – Molag Bal May 28 '16 at 0:16
  • 3
    @armadillo - "Urinating in public?" POW! WHAM! ARGH! "Not in my town, you piece of filth!" – Wad Cheber May 28 '16 at 0:21
  • 1
    Bruce's eyes would later go on to become their own superheroes, who actually managed to scare criminals straight. – Rogue Jedi May 28 '16 at 0:38
0

It would seem to me as a longtime fan of the many different incarnations of Batman and having seen many versions of the scene in which both of his parents are killed, that the falling pearls represent the lost Innocence and security that leads to Bruce Wayne's psychological change and is indeed the moment in which Batman is truly born. The fact that the pearls are white and were in an ordered state when worn by his mother and now after their deaths are shown to be broken, falling and scattered. This can easily be assumed to be representative of Bruce's own sense of order and security in the world being similarly shattered. With them falling around the bodies of his parents, this would seem to indicate that the world, his world has been forever changed. It is a very pervasive image and seems to be incorporated in nearly every cinematic depiction of the fall of Thomas and Martha Wayne. Earlier comic book depictions of this event do not include this element as it is most likely tied to Frank Miller's interpretation in his version of The Dark Knight Returns. One can only assume that this is an archetypal image and has been repeated several times and every cinematic and several animated versions of this event because of its powerful and nonverbal communication ability to represent the irrevocable change in young Bruce's reality.enter image description hereenter image description here

  • This doesn't answer the question: does every version feature this imagery? – Politank-Z Jan 10 '17 at 3:56
  • @Politank-Z - it does: Earlier comic book depictions of this event do not include this element as it is most likely tied to Frank Miller's interpretation in his version of The Dark Knight Returns – Gallifreyan Jan 10 '17 at 7:46

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.