43

Towards the end of Civil War, Captain America:

Starts smashing up Iron Man's Arc Reactor.

Doesn't he need that to live?

Was Steve going for a kill shot, or did he not realise how important it was?

  • 13
    his arc tractor? – Molag Bal Jun 2 '16 at 8:50
  • 45
    It's the west country version – AncientSwordRage Jun 2 '16 at 8:54
  • 7
    Aside from his non-dependency (see answer below), the reactor was not completely smashed. You can see some glow after it's damaged. If it were completely destroyed, the suit would have zero power and Tony would have a hard time moving. – The Evil Greebo Jun 2 '16 at 13:16
  • 4
    Point of note, the suit has it's own reactor. That's the one that Captain smashed. – Chris K Jun 2 '16 at 17:28
  • 22
    A better question would be "Why is it unshielded, exposed, and glowing to make it a conspicuous high value target?" and the answer is "Because it's a comic book." – Peter Wone Jun 3 '16 at 0:04
105

Tony hasn't needed the reactor to live ever since the end of Iron Man 3, when he underwent surgery to remove it. He doesn't wear it any more; now, the reactor is only for the suit.

[we see Tony undergoing surgery to remove the shrapnel near his heart]

Tony Stark: [voice over] Of course, there are people who say progress is dangerous. But I'll bet none of those idiots ever had to live with a chest full of shrapnel. And now...neither will I. Let me tell you, that was the best sleep I'd had in years.

It's likely Steve Rogers knew about this, since some time passed since Iron Man 3.

  • 13
    So one of the few MCU movies I've not seen is what I was missing. Thanks – AncientSwordRage Jun 2 '16 at 8:56
  • 18
    I wouldn't say you were "missing it", @AncientSwordRage. – Paul Jun 2 '16 at 12:39
  • 8
    IM3 accomplishes two things in the overall MCU. 1) It removes the need for the Arc Reactor implant, and 2) it sets the stage for Pepper and Tony splitting up. Beyond that it doesn't really develop the universe at all, and the story-line is massively MEH. – The Evil Greebo Jun 2 '16 at 13:13
  • 39
    3) Introduces Extremis for Agents of Shield S1, 4) Develops the character of the President and the position of the US Government, 5) Develops the character of Tony Stark – OrangeDog Jun 2 '16 at 13:43
  • 14
    Interestingly, there's a spot in Civil War where you can see the scar on Tony's chest where the reactor once was. I thought it was a nice touch. – Irishpanda Jun 2 '16 at 14:10
1

Once the shrapnel was removed iron man didn't need it to live but only for the suit to function so therefore once he destroyed the reactor the suit shut down.

  • 3
    Welcome to SFF! While this answer is correct it does not seem to add any additional information to answers already given. – Skooba Jun 7 '16 at 19:38
  • 1
    When did the shrapnel get removed? – AncientSwordRage Jun 7 '16 at 21:48
-2

Its more that Capt America knew he needed it to function rather than to live. With the reactor damaged, he could beat Iron Man.

  • 3
    I get that he needs it to function, but I didn't get that he didn't need it to live. – AncientSwordRage Jun 2 '16 at 20:25
-3

I don't really think Cap knew that Tony removed the Arc Reactor. In the movie as you have seen, Cap does take a couple shots at the reactor which lead me to assume that Cap didn't know. And then again, Tony could have told Cap during the second Avengers movie. Also, reactor or not, Capt wouldn't have cared because when Tony started attacking Bucky, Cap just wanted to protect Bucky.

protected by Rogue Jedi Jul 22 '16 at 21:41

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.