28

In T2 after the liquid metal terminator crashes into the metal foundry he is frozen by the liquid nitrogen payload from the truck.

As a single mass (well apart from the shattered feet) the T1000 has far less surface area than the hundreds (thousands?) of shattered pieces. Less surface area usually means less thermal transfer, so shattering him would have rapidly accelerated the return to a functional state.

So, huge mistake or Hollywood going for the dramatic exploding robot scene?

  • 2
    Either it was a mistake to do so or he missed a great opportunity to separate the pieces and keep him from being able to achieve enough functionality to be effective. But shattering him and then running away was probably not the best solution. – Chad Mar 22 '12 at 13:37
  • 6
    @Chad, how about fighting off an army of terminator rats all coming after you? – Sam Mar 22 '12 at 14:19
  • 1
    My buddy Sean’s been saying this for 20 years. – Paul D. Waite Aug 16 '12 at 20:28
  • 1
    I don't think this is answer-worthy, but it did delay the T-1000 for a few seconds while it reassembled. – ApproachingDarknessFish Feb 12 '14 at 8:03
  • I've protected this to stop the constant stream of worthless answers about how he should have picked up the T-1000 and thrown it into the furnace. – Valorum Jul 2 '16 at 23:31
34

If you consider the deleted scenes showing the T-1000 "glitching" (which appear in the special edition), then it certainly wasn't a mistake. The act of freezing then shattering the T-1000 caused some damage to its control over its morphing ability.

It was actually this "glitch" that helped John Connor tell the difference between his real mother and the T-1000 in disguise. Here's a still image from the scene, showing the feet of the T-1000 involuntarily morphing into the grating below:

enter image description here

  • 2
    I thought the glitching was caused by high temperatures, not the shattering. – Royal Flush Mar 27 '12 at 14:44
20

I think that, whether or not it was effective, it was not a mistake.

My impression of what happened is that there was no known methodology for destroying a T-1000 using 20th century technology. Considering the time pressures under which Skynet was operating, it is entirely possible that no knowledge of how to destroy a T-1000 existed anywhere.

Since the T-800 had no knowledge of how to effectively fight or destroy the T-1000, it was forced to experiment. While failed experiments can be dangerous, the knowledge gained is nevertheless valuable in and of itself.

  • 2
    +1 Agreed, they were looking for a way, any way, to stop the T-1000 and in the absence of firm knowledge trying things out is as good a methodology as any other. – PhilPursglove Mar 22 '12 at 16:25
  • 12
    "there was no known methodology for destroying a T-1000 using 20th century technology." Umm.. vat of molten steel? Not very high-tech, but quite effective. Carrying the frozen form to any of the existing containers of molten steel and dropping it in would have been far more effective at destroying it than shooting it to pieces. – Andrew Thompson Mar 9 '13 at 10:29
  • 1
    @AndrewThompson how would we know if that worked if it wasn't tried first? – oɔɯǝɹ Jan 27 '15 at 23:45
  • How could Arny "gain knowledge" if he doesn't have the ability to learn? – DCOPTimDowd Dec 1 '17 at 19:40
8

I don't think it's a huge mistake. Despite unfreezing quicker, being separated from his constituent parts may have had some negative effect on the T-1000.

For instance, the T-1000 is made of mimetic poly-alloy, and likely (ok, so were entering speculation town, population: Me) relies on magnetic effects for some conduction effects. It may use gigantic magnetoresistance which relies on a soft magnet's spin being easily flipped at room temperature. Being a part for such a long time, without contact to the other pieces may have slowed it down somewhat.

Along with that as a poly-alloy it may not have had a completely metalic structure and relied on polymer aspects. If these aspects were semiconducting as some polymers are, that would have had a similar jarring effect. Not to mention it would have maybe damaged some of them on a molecular level

In summary, yes it'd likely that it was for that 'Hollywood Effect', but it's not impossible that smashing the T-1000 had it's own benefits for Arney.

  • 5
    I like speculation town. – Xantec Mar 22 '12 at 13:06
  • hmmm... I alway thought the poly was more in the sense of polycarbonate (ie. many atoms or groups of a particular kind in the molecules of the metal) - not the synthetic organic polymer kind. – Craig Mar 22 '12 at 14:23
  • @cp21yos I think you're putting more thought into it than the screenwriter did at that point :) – Tacroy Mar 22 '12 at 19:01
  • 1
    @cppl: The meaning of poly in polycarbonate and organic polymer is exactly the same. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polycarbonate – ThePopMachine Jan 27 '15 at 23:08
6

I feel it was definitely a huge mistake, he should have picked it up (as many pieces as he could gather) and thrown it into the molten metal into which it is eventually thrown.

  • 2
    I wonder if, after that, the remaining pieces would come together in a mini-T1000 - then they'd be fighting something that could hide easily, shimmy up a pole, then drop down on top of them and puncture and cut before anyone sees it. – Tango Mar 22 '12 at 15:50
  • 3
    Well they could actually unite , but as it would loose a major portion of its body , it would maybe loose its objective and probably end up having drinks with Connor. – shrawan zadoo Mar 23 '12 at 7:39
  • 4
    @Tango: "I shall call him ... mini-T." – Keith Thompson Jan 27 '15 at 20:30
4

After Arnie shoots the frozen T-1000, and the pieces start to reform, there is a shot of Arnie noticing the fragments coming together. What I get from this is that he didn't expect this to happen. Possibly explained by the fact that he is an older model, and the poly-alloy is something he has no information on. Maybe it's cutting edge technology, even in the future. So I think it was a poor judgement, rather than a mistakeI'm pretty sure the "glitching" is caused by high temperatures.

0

Speaking on a purely speculative basis, I have always thought that the smart move after the T-1000 was frozen would have been for the T-800 to pick it up and throw it into the molten steel. The only reason I can see for not doing so is that it would have made for a less exciting ending to the movie.

  • Wad, want to make this superlong, pics, etc? – Adamant Jul 5 '16 at 5:17
-1

I've read book "Terminator" and yes; the act of freezing then shattering the T-1000 caused some damage to its ability to control its morphing capabilities.

  • 6
    Can you cite the relevant passage in the book? This would improve your answer. – Null Jan 27 '15 at 19:15
  • This doesn't answer the question of whether the Terminator erred by shooting the frozen T-1000 – Valorum Jan 27 '15 at 19:31
  • @Richard - it does answer IMHO, albiet not perfectly – DVK-on-Ahch-To Jan 27 '15 at 20:15
  • 1
    This question needs a citation from the book to back it up, and some editing for content. It's not 'wrong', but it's very low quality right now. – Zibbobz Jan 27 '15 at 20:39

protected by Valorum Jul 2 '16 at 23:30

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.