What is Trial of Seven?
As already stated by Ram, Trial of Seven is another form of Trial by Combat. In it, Both the defenders and accusers are divided into two teams of Seven men each. They fight until one of the party either surrenders or dies.
This was explained by Prince Baelor Breakspear:
Prince Baelor shifted uncomfortably in his seat. “It is another form
of trial by combat. Ancient, seldom invoked. It came across the narrow
sea with the Andals and their seven gods. In any trial by combat, the
accuser and accused are asking the gods to decide the issue between
them. The Andals believed that if the seven champions fought on each
side, the gods, being thus honored, would be more like to take a hand
and see that a just result was achieved.”
What are the rules?
A Trial of Seven has following rules:
- All participants must be Knights. Ser Steffon Fossoway explained it in The Hedge Knight:
“Raymun the Reluctant,” mocked his cousin Ser Steffon. An apple made
of gold and garnets fastened his cloak of yellow wool. “You need not
fear, cousin, this is a knightly combat. As you are no knight, your
skin is not at risk. Ser Duncan, you have one Fossoway at least. The
ripe one. I saw what Aerion did to those puppeteers. I am for you.”
- There must be seven men on each side. If one party can't find seven men, it is judged guilty and there is no need to conduct a trial. When Duncan could not find a seventh man to take up his cause, he offered to fight six against seven but was refused.
“Six,” said Dunk. “Ser Lyonel is knighting Raymun Fossoway. We will
fight you six against seven.”
Men had won at far worse odds, he knew. But Lord Ashford shook his
head. “That is not permitted, ser. If you cannot find another
knight to take your side, you must be declared guilty of the crimes of
which you stand accused.”
- If the accuser dies or withdraws his allegations during the combat, the trial is over and the defendant is cleared of all charges. If the defendant dies or presumably admits his guilt, the trial is over and the defendant is judged to be guilty. Otherwise, the trial continues until all members of one party either die or surrender. Prince Baelor explained this to his men during the trial at Ashford:
“If Ser Duncan is killed, it is considered that the gods have
judged him guilty, and the contest is over. If both of his
accusers are slain, or withdraw their accusations, the same is true.
Else-wise, all seven of one side or the other must perish or yield
for the trial to end.”
Who can demand one and who can participate?
Only knights can demand a Trial of Seven. When Prince Aerion demanded a trial by Seven in response of Duncan's demand for Trial by Combat, Lord Leo Tyrell agreed that "Ser Aerion" (Notice he uses Ser, not Prince) was within his rights:
"A trial of seven,” said Prince Aerion, smiling. “That is my right, I
do believe".
.
.
“Or mayhap they simply had a taste for swordplay,” said Lord Leo
Tyrell, a cynical smile touching his lips. “Regardless, Ser Aerion
is within his rights. A trial of seven it must be.”
As stated already, only knights can participate on either side:
“Raymun the Reluctant,” mocked his cousin Ser Steffon. An apple made
of gold and garnets fastened his cloak of yellow wool. “You need not
fear, cousin, this is a knightly combat. As you are no knight, your
skin is not at risk. Ser Duncan, you have one Fossoway at least. The
ripe one. I saw what Aerion did to those puppeteers. I am for you.”
How is it different than a regular trial by combat?
I have created the following table to summarize differences between regular trial by combat and the trial of Seven.
Property |
Trial by Combat |
Trial of Seven |
Is between two people i.e. 1 Accuser and 1 Defendant |
✓ |
X |
Participants have to be knights |
X |
✓ |
Can be demanded only by Knights |
X |
✓ |
Features more than two combatants |
X |
✓ |
Is an Andal tradition |
✓ |
✓ |
Ends with death/surrender of Accuser |
✓ |
✓ |
Ends with death/surrender of defender |
✓ |
✓ |
Allows nominating champions in stead of Accuser/defender |
✓ |
Unclear |
What does its outcome mean?
There can be multiple outcomes.
- If the accuser dies or withdraws his accusation, the defendant is cleared of all charges.
- If the defendant dies or confesses his guilt, the defendant is judged guilty.
- If the accuser's party is killed or forced into surrender, the defendant is declared innocent.
- If the defendant's party is killed or is forced into surrender, the defendant is declared guilty.
It is unclear what happens if both sides die (King Maegor vs Warrior's sons was a close thing as all the combatants died and sole survivor, King Maegor fell into comma right after killing his last foe). I would assume that the party whose members die the last will be considered the victor.