Some background: Tolkien's history of elves singing and ents walking and talking.

One of the foundations of Tolkien's mythology is the Elves being the Firstborn. The Dwarves are even put back to sleep until the Elves awake. I've always taken this to mean the first born sentient race1.

However, several quotes are making me question this:

Even some whole inventions like the remarkable Ents, oldest of living rational creatures, Shepherds of the Trees, are omitted.

The Letters of J.R.R. Tolkien, To Milton Waldman (#131), p. 160

Ents. The most ancient people surviving in the Third Age were the Onodrim or Enyd. Ent was the form of their name in the language of Rohan.

The Lord of the Rings: Return of the King, Appendix F: The Languages and Peoples of the Third Age, p. 511

[...]before the Children awake there shall go forth with wings like the wind the Eagles of the Lords of the West."

The Silmarillion, Of Aulë and Yavanna, p. 41

There's another quote from the Silmarillion abouts Ents that contradicts the ones above:

When the Children awake, then the thought of Yavanna will awake also, and it will summon spirits from afar[...]

ibid.

Concerning the Dwarves, Ilúvatar says this:

But I will not suffer this: that these should come before the Firstborn of my design, nor that thy impatience should be rewarded. They shall sleep now in the darkness under stone, and shall not come forth until the Firstborn have awakened upon Earth

The Silmarillion, Of Aulë and Yavanna, p. 38

So, are Elves not the first sentient beings to awaken? Were they only called "Firstborn" in relation to Men? Was it the Ents? Or maybe Eagles?

I am obviously excluding from this any race that was created outside Arda (Ainur, Maiar) or weird individuals (Bombadil, Ungoliant).

1"race", "species", "ethnicity" or whatever. Not trying to start a semantics war.

All citations from the Harper Collins editions

  • 6
    @Po-ta-toe Bombadil is nothing and everything. We do not mention him. – isanae Oct 3 '16 at 7:35
  • 4
    Just as an idea: First-born may mean the first ones who come into being, i.e. those created, which would exclude those who have always been there. This would clearly lead to the fact that Ents and the Great Eagles are eternal spirits. – Philip Klöcking Oct 3 '16 at 8:19
  • 1
    @isanae: 1) There are spirits that did not take part in the Ainulindalë. 2) The Ainur are all spirits that took part in it (or entered earth), this includes both Maiar and Valar (equal in kind, but not in power!). 3) There are numerous spirits (Maiar) that appear on Arda clad in mortal bodies that resemble 'lesser' beings, e.g. the Istari (as humans), certain Orcs, Ungolianth (as spider, but almost certainly no Maia, as not part in the song) and Melian (as elf). It is not that far off to assume that there were other Maiar that were akin to Yavanna that took the form of tree, horse, or eagle. – Philip Klöcking Oct 3 '16 at 21:47
  • 1
    4) I will not start a discussion on the notion of eternity or God. As of now, it will suffice to point out that it is rather meaningless to speak of time or existence before the first thought of Eru, while at the same time it is reasonable to assume that with the first thought of him the spirits came into being. If you want to think more about this trifling paradox, I recommend reading about the Kaballah's principle of Zimzum ;) – Philip Klöcking Oct 3 '16 at 22:01
  • 1
    Perhaps it's because Ents grow from seeds and Eagles hatch from eggs, so the Elves are the first to be born. (Not a serious comment.) – Nathaniel Oct 4 '16 at 9:14

Ok, so here's what happened, in order:

  1. Eru Ilúvatar would create Elves and then Men in the coming of the children of Iluvatar. Aulë, not wanting to wait until the coming of the children to have beings to whom he could teach his crafts, created 7 Dwarves in secret. But Aulë did not actually have the power to create life, so these Dwarves were not technically a sentient species.
  2. Ilúvatar finds out about these Dwarves and reprimands Aulë for his impatience. Aulë realises he has made a mistake and offers up the Dwarves for Ilúvatar to do with as he will, including destroy them if he so wished.
  3. Ilúvatar accepts Aulë's offering and grants the 7 Dwarves life, so when Aulë attempts to destroy his creations, they cower in fear and beg for mercy, which Aulë grants them.
  4. Ilúvatar decrees that he shall not suffer Dwarves to exist before his children, and so the 7 Dwarves shall sleep underground until his children awaken and walk Middle-Earth.
  5. Yavanna voices concern for her creations, the plants and animals, for she fears the Dwarves would fell them to fuel their industrious nature. Aulë, in defense of his Dwarves, informs her that Ilúvatar's children would also have need of trees. She then asks Manwë for counsel and asks that her creations be protected. When asked which she would have protection granted to, she replies that all things have their worth, but that trees should punish those who wrong them.
  6. Manwë informs Ilúvatar of Yavanna's request and Ilúvatar grants it. It is said that when the Firstborn (The Elves) awaken, spirits shall descend to Middle-Earth and inhabit beings within it, guardians who will protect the plants and animals. This is the conception of both the Ents and the Great Eagles.

So in fact many races were created long before the Elves ever existed, but all were asleep before the Elves awoken. The first race to awaken on Middle-Earth were the Elves. Technically speaking, the very first race to "awaken" on Arda were the Dwarves, as they were created first by Aulë and granted life by Ilúvatar before they were put to sleep.

EDIT: Extra bit to answer OP's last question at the bottom of their post. Yes, the term "Firstborn" is applied to Elves only in relation to men. Men are, in comparison, known as the "Afterborn".

  • 1
    Great answer and good explanation on difference between being awaken and being alive :) – Tjafaas Oct 3 '16 at 12:07
  • 1
    The Elves were the Firstborn of the Children of Iluvatar (as @Victim's answer makes clear). – Matt Gutting Oct 3 '16 at 13:42
  • 1
    Hm, the concept of the Eagles definitely came after the Dwarves were granted life, but perhaps they would descend to Middle-Earth just before the Firstborn awoke. Though I have to say, I find it difficult to believe Ilúvatar would have permitted creatures to inhabit Middle-Earth prior to his Firstborn. Additionally, considering that Elves are vegetarian, you would think that priority would have been given to the Ents over the Eagles, as the Elves would have need of wood long before they had need of meat or hide. – DisturbedNeo Oct 3 '16 at 15:50
  • 1
    I think the concept of Eagles was in the Music. The sentence prior to my quote is: "But dost them not now remember, Kementári, that thy thought sang not always alone? Did not thy thought and mine meet also, so that we took wing together like great birds that soar above the clouds?" Also, it's not clear that Elves were vegetarian. – isanae Oct 3 '16 at 16:01
  • 2
    I'd be happy to accept this answer, but it has no information on the Eagles and Ents quotes from the question. You assert that "The first race to awaken on Middle-Earth were the Elves", but the quotes do not support that assertion. If you have no further information, you should at least mention the discrepancy. – isanae Oct 4 '16 at 5:14

There is a distinction between species in Middle-earth that provides the answer here, and that is the distinction between what is called "races" in the question, and Children of Iluvatar; these are not the same thing.

The Ainulindale provides a definition for Children of Iluvatar:

For the Children of Iluvatar were conceived by him alone; and they came with the third theme, and were not in the theme which Iluvatar propounded at the beginning, and none of the Ainur had part in their making.

Elves are therefore the Firstborn Children of Iluvatar which is confirmed by the Index to the Silmarillion:

Firstborn, The: The Elder Children of Iluvatar, the Elves.

But none of this precludes the existence of other species who are not Children of Iluvatar, whether they be sentient or not; i.e. species that both Iluvatar and the Ainur had a hand in the making of.

  • 1
    I'm not sure why you say that "none of this precludes the existence of other species who are not Children of Iluvatar". Ilúvatar's speech to Aulë is rather clear: my children first. – isanae Oct 3 '16 at 15:30
  • 1
    The Dwarves are also children of Iluvatar, even though they were initially created by Aule. Iluvatar calls the Dwarves "the children of my adoption" Iluvatar didn't want the Dwarves to awaken before the Elves, but the sentence "none of this precludes the existence of other species who are not Children of Iluvatar" still makes sense. – Dennis_E Oct 4 '16 at 11:03

Is possibly a word play?

None of the other examples that you mention, Ents or eagles, give birth. Ents may germinate, eagles hatch from eggs. The initial Dwarves were created and were asleep. They did not reproduce until after they were re awoken

Elves do give birth and so were possibly the 'first born' in a literal sense.

  • 2
    This is a bit like superman being the "Last son of krypton" as he was the last male child to be born there before it exploded. – Jeremy French Oct 3 '16 at 10:10
  • 4
    Ent(wives) do give birth – user46509 Oct 3 '16 at 11:20
  • 1
    @Po-ta-toe: really? I don’t know anywhere that Tolkien, er, goes into the mechanics of it, but absent such evidence, I would have assumed that the reproduction of ents involved seeds and germination and so on, not anything like mammalian pregnancy and birth. – PLL Oct 3 '16 at 15:18
  • 3
    @isanae: while I don’t think this suggestion is correct, it does makes sense: if you read “first born” very literally, then elves could have been the first sentient beings to be born (in the literal sense of birth) — the eagles were hatched from eggs, the ents sprouted from seeds, and no dwarves were literally born until after the initial 7 were re-awakened and started multiplying. Other great authors have played on exactly the same distinction, e.g. “no man of woman born” in Macbeth. But it wouldn’t be at all Tolkien’s style to use this sort of wordplay in the histories. – PLL Oct 3 '16 at 15:51
  • 2
    @PLL "Far off yet is his doom, and not by the hand of man will he fall"? :) – isanae Oct 3 '16 at 16:19

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.