44

Ferengi culture reveres those who swindle people for maximum profit. So why aren't Ferengi spaceships constantly breaking down because they were fitted with shoddy or non-functioning parts?

  • 11
    Repeat high value custom is better than a single higher value transaction, if no one comes to you for parts then you close up fairly quickly. I would imagine that this is a more discussion based question, as opposed to anything society wide established in canon – user001 Oct 26 '16 at 9:48
  • 81
    Typical Federation anti-Ferengi prejudice... – Paul D. Waite Oct 26 '16 at 11:08
  • 17
    You should become familiar with the term "enlightened self-interest". – chrylis Oct 26 '16 at 14:21
  • 6
    @chrylis On the contrary, it's those who think that philosophy actually works who are the most in need of becoming more familiar with it! – Mason Wheeler Oct 26 '16 at 14:50
  • 7
    Hey now. Our subject is fictional Ferengi guided by the rules of acquisition. Not Republicans guided by the works of Ayn Rand. There's a difference. Mostly in the ears. – candied_orange Oct 27 '16 at 6:56
50

It's a common misconception that the Ferengi revere those who swindle others to maximize profits. The truth is, at once, simpler and more complex: the Ferengi only really care about maximizing profits, and don't much care how it's done. A Ferengi who corners a market full of lemons by producing significantly more reliable parts at competitive prices is just doing good business. If others see him as more "honest", well, that's good for public relations, and there's some value in that, but it's not really the point. (And besides, those who care about honesty would probably do well to put this Ferengi's sources of materials and labor under heavy scrutiny).

Because of this greater emphasis on profit, the Ferengi are prepared to tolerate some loss of quality in the name of lower costs, or, more generally, some increase in risk in the name of greater opportunity. They will even tolerate these things to a greater degree than others might, because there's a great deal of reverence for the guy who bets on the long shot when it pays off. Consider Rule of Acquisition #62: "The riskier the road, the greater the profit".

But there are still limits. Rule #125, as quoted in other answers already: "You can't make a deal if you're dead". Ferengi ships do seem to suffer from some reliability issues as compared to other ships, and the Ferengi put up with this in the name of cost. But no Ferengi would buy a ship that did not, on a basic level, function, nor would they buy one without asking for a demonstration of its functionality. An offworlder might, and those are the ones you foist the lemons off on. You don't insult a shrewder customer's intelligence, though. Bad for business.

  • A hard choice between this answer and Damon's, but I could only choose one! – Wallnut Oct 27 '16 at 8:22
66

Rule of acquisition #125:

You can't make a deal if you're dead.

Surely, no self-respecting Ferengi would break rule #3, but note the wording: "Never spend more than you have to". Certainly, you have to spend enough on your spaceship to stay alive and avoid getting stranded 25 light years from the next outpost.

Ferengi selling starships to other Ferengi will arguably be tempted to be deceptive, but finally they are limited by rule #17 ("A contract is a contract is a contract... between Ferengi"). A clever Ferengi buying a Starship will (unless there is no other choice) not put his thumb onto a contract which doesn't guarantee an operative ship and at least standard quality parts.

That being said, Ferengi spaceships do have shoddy parts which do break down occasionally. That, and distant relatives will occasionally deliberately sabotage them...

  • 15
    What are rules #3 and #17? – OrangeDog Oct 26 '16 at 12:54
  • 5
    @OrangeDog: "Never spend more on an acquisition than you have to" (mentioned in the answer), and "A contract is a contract is a contract... between Ferengi". The latter is, by the way, less a "guideline" in the sense all other rules of acquisition are (as stated by Gint), but a compelling, undisputable law, unless you want to be liquidated by the FTA. Refer to the episode when Quark, believing he was going to die, sold his body slices while still alive (which was a totally irrelevant detail for the contract). – Damon Oct 26 '16 at 13:28
8

Having a functioning starship gives you a competitive advantage over your rivals, and a valuable asset to sell off later when you retire to your own moon.

  • "Gaila promised to buy Quark a ship if he became successful. Gaila finally appeared to honor his debt in 2372 when he sent Quark a Ferengi shuttle, which Quark designated 'Quark's Treasure'. The shuttle was later found to have been sabotaged in a failed attempt by Gaila to kill Quark." – Jesse C. Slicer Oct 26 '16 at 17:11
  • @JesseC.Slicer Can you imagine the layers upon layers of sabotage, lol. Some in fact being designed to be located after considerable effort, in an attempt to allow the more devious sabotages to remain hidden. – Tony Ennis Oct 29 '16 at 16:05
  • I can also imagine counter-saboteurs disabling third-party sabotage, to keep the owner alive because of outstanding debts or contractual obligations... – pete the pagan-gerbil Oct 31 '16 at 7:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.