7

Look here for the video reference. In the Flashpoint, at the beginning of season 3 of The Flash, Barry Allen lets Eobard Thawne to go back to the fateful night and kill Barry's mom. Ok, here is the crucial part of changing a timeline.

The original timeline was changed by Barry at the end of season 2 by stopping Eobard from killing his mom (1:50). As a result of this event (of saving his mom) we see the Barry behind the door smiling (that his mom is now saved) and vanishing (2:11) because well, the timeline changed!

So, now we know that the timeline changes due to an altering event. (Pretty obvious, right?)

But when Eobard comes to kill Barry's mom again, we see that Barry and the other Eobard lying on the floor are both vanishing (2:37).

Wait, hold on! The new Eobard hasn't yet killed Barry's mom. So no event has yet occurred that could change the new timeline where Barry's parents are alive. Then how could Barry and Eobard (the one lying on the floor) vanish? This makes it easy for the new Eobard to kill Barry's mom without a fight from Barry. This is so not possible! No event occurred, so no erasing of timeline, and therefore no Barry should be vanishing yet!

What should have happened here is that the recent most Eobard and Barry, who agree that timeline needs to be reset come back to the fateful night and convince the previous Barry, who just saved his mom, to allow his mom to get killed or else fight him if he doesn't agree. Only after his mom is killed, should the previous Barry and Eobard (lying on the floor) vanish as only now the timeline is reset.

What am I missing here? Or is it that the show writers missed this plot?

  • 2
    With time travel, the words “before” and “after” become a little tricky. – Paul D. Waite May 11 '17 at 19:47
  • This is full of paradoxes. Every time travel is. This is more than one time travel at one point. The first Flash which vanished after smiling shouldn't have been there in the first place. If you think you've figured out the correct way the event could be executed, you're simply an ignorant (remember, nobody should vanish; they simply shouldn't be there). This is simply Wibbly-Wobbly Timey-Wimey stuff without any correct solution. – I Love You 3000 Nov 4 '18 at 9:03
  • Captain Kirk: "I don't believe in the no win scenario." – MycrofD Nov 4 '18 at 9:06
  • So yes, there should be a right way to execute the wibbly wobbly timey wimey stuff. – MycrofD Nov 4 '18 at 9:09
0

Out of universe - If you want to get technical, each time we've seen the same event, it's been incomplete because they hadn't thought of the later iteration of the moment. See also how much more complicated Fry's accidental cryo-freezing was in Futurama, as each later story involved more people going back and affecting the moment.

You're also not mentioning the FIRST time he goes back to attempt to stop the murder - the Flash of that moment looks at him, and tells him to stay away. So there's a THREE-fold overlap here, with FOUR Flashes from various moments in his timeline.

1) Original events - Flash tries and fails to stop Reverse Flash from killing his mom.

2) Travels back "again" to try and stop it, original Flash stops him.

3) Goes back and successfully stops Reverse Flash, causing Flashpoint

4) Travels to moments after the events of 3, allows the deed to be completed by Thawne #2

In-universe - Consider what we theoretically SHOULD have seen in the list above. At no point do we ever see ALL of these events.

There's a remote chance that the Flash we seen in version 2 is actually from an even LATER point in his timeline, trying to go back further than before to sort everything, which would explain how he knew about "Flash #2" being there.

One could surmise that simply by going back to START the change to the timeline, some retroactive change to the events may occur. And since all we can really do is surmise, with no facts to use, that's what we'll do.

Another possibility is that the "Flash of the moment" only sees the other versions of himself for the instants that they're supposed to interact. So it may only SEEM like Flash and Thawne "vanished", when in fact Barry took off to get up to speed to make their return trip.

  • You are using Futurama as a reference which in this case many may not know about, like me. The first time Barry went, he saved his younger version, not his mom. That's it. Period. But the second time he went after (Cisco made a time machine), he was stopped. So all these events belong to a timeline that has not been affected yet. Fun (flashpoint paradox) starts when he went the third time and actually saved his mom creating a new timeline. Therefore the second Barry vanishes because of the creation of a new timeline. When Eobard comes to kill this time, he has come to kill, not killed yet. – MycrofD Nov 4 '16 at 7:59
-1

My answer: the writers probably messed up.

Instead of showing the latest/most recent Eobard just showing up saying "Actually she's not", they should have shown him appearing outside the house a few moments earlier (because he can time travel!) and then he should have stopped Barry from entering the house in the first place to save his mom.

side comment: This would have led to some more action, and more complexity to the story-arc, and the show-runners were probably not up for doing that. They probably wanted to wrap up this event soon.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.