9

So Harry's broom was jinxed by Professor Quirrell in the Philosophers Stone and he was knocked over by Miss Granger, while Snape was doing a countercurse.

‘No, no, no. I tried to kill you. Your friend Miss Granger accidentally knocked me over as she rushed to set fire to Snape at that Quidditch match. She broke my eye contact with you. Another few seconds and I’d have got you off that broom. I’d have managed it before then if Snape hadn’t been muttering a countercurse, trying to save you.’

Philosopher's Stone - page 209 - Bloomsbury - chapter seventeen, The Man With Two Faces - Harry Potter and Professor Quirrell

However according to the incident, it took something like 30 seconds between knocking over Professor Quirrell and the fire disrupting Snape, and it's only after the later than Harry regains control of his broom.

Hermione has fought her way across to the stand where Snape stood and was now racing along the row behind him; she didn't even stop to say sorry as she knocked Professors Quirrell headfirst into the row in front. Harry Potter and the Philosophers Stone, Chapter Quidditch

At this point the Jinx should be broken but it's not and the counter-curse is still ongoing at this point

It took perhaps thirty second for Snape to realise that he was on fire. A sudden yelp told her she had done her job. Harry Potter and the Philosophers Stone, Chapter Quidditch

And it's only after this that Harry re-gains control of his broom.

Up in the air, Harry was suddenly able to clamber back on to his broom. Harry Potter and the Philosophers Stone, Chapter Quidditch

My question is two fold, why did the jinx not fail once Quirrell lost eye contact ?

And why only after the countercurse was stopped was Harry able to regain control of his broom?

I think Snape was up to something.

15

You're assuming the curse/jinx is instantly dispelled by the act of breaking eye contact whereas the evidence would strongly suggest that once Quirrel stopped casting it, Snape still had to take some time to undo the spell. Luckily he was able to do so before he realised that his robes were on fire.

Presumably, had Hermione not decided to set him alight, he would have stopped casting the spell anyway (once he'd completed his countercurse), rendering her magical assistance somewhat moot.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.